ARTICLE

Comparison of sucrose and ethanol-induced c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the parabrachial nuclei and accumbens nucleus

Yiseul Kim, Young Kyung Cho*
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 210-702, Korea
*Corresponding Author : Young Kyung Cho, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 210-702, Korea Tel: +82-33-640-2451, Fax: +82-33-642-6410, ykcho@gwnu.ac.kr

© Journal of Biomedical Research All rights reserved. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 23, 2015; Revised: Mar 20, 2015; Accepted: Mar 25, 2015

Abstract

Sucrose and alcohol are rewarding and appetitive. They are occasionally over-consumed and cause addiction. The parabrachial nuclei (PbN) are the second taste relay in the central taste pathway. The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is an important neural substrate in the reward system. Intake of sucrose or alcohol induces dopamine release in the NAcc. Although alcohol is not classified as a taste stimulus, a substantial number of sucrose-responsive neurons in the PbN respond to stimulation by alcohol on the tongue. In the present study, we investigated whether or not application of 0.5 M sucrose, 10% ethanol (EtOH), mixture of sucrose and EtOH, and double-distilled water (DDW) to the tongue induces c-Fos-like immunoreactivity (cFLI) in the PbN and NAcc. We also examined whether or not the number of cFLI following sucrose/EtOH is comparable to the number of cFLIs following sucrose and EtOH, respectively. Male Sprague-Dwaley rat was anesthetized with a mixture of Zoletil and Rompun while stimulation solution was applied to the anterior tongue. The rat was sacrificed by perfusion, and the fixed brain was sectioned and immunostained. Data from a total of 18 animals were analyzed. The number of cFLI following stimulation with sucrose and/or EtOH was greater than that of DDW in the PbN. Numbers of cFLI following sucrose, EtOH, and sucrose/EtOH were not significantly different from each other in the PbN. The number of cFLI in response to stimulation solution was not different from that of DDW in the NAcc. The result of the present study suggests that not only sucrose but also EtOH activates some neurons in the PbN, and that some pontine neurons possibly respond to both sucrose and EtOH.

Keywords: sucrose; ethanol; c-fos; parabrachial; accumbens

Introduction

Foods with high calories such as sucrose and fats are rewarding and induce appetite [1]. Palatable food is often over-consumed more than needs for maintaining homeostasis and can cause obesity [2]. Although alcohol is not classified as taste stimulus, it is perceived as palatable and often over-consumed [3]. Therefore it is likely that reward system also participates in the regulation of palatable food as does taste system.

Taste information is transferred to the central nervous system from taste receptors in the oral cavity via three gustatory nerves, which are branches of facial nerves (VII), glossopharyngeal (IX), and vagus (Xth) nerves [4, 5]. The chorda tympani nerve, a branch of facial nerve innervates two thirds of the anterior tongue [5]. The first taste relay in the central taste pathway is the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) in the medulla [6-8]. The NST sends projections to the parabrachial nuclei (PbN) in the pons [4, 6]. The PbN transmit taste information to the thalamus and ventral forebrain gustatory centers [9-11]. The lateral hypothalamus (LH), central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in the ventral forebrain send efferent fibers back to the PbN and NST [12-14]. Although alcohol is not classified as taste stimulus, some gustatory neurons in the PbN and NST responded to alcohol and sucrose [15, 16].

The nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in the ventral forebrain is a pivotal neural structure in reward system and is of particular importance in drug addiction such as alcohol. Although the NAcc is not positioned in the central taste pathway, it communicates extensively with various gustatory nuclei in the ventral forebrain, including the LH, CeA, and BNST anatomically [17-19]. Investigations suggesting an important role of NAcc in mediating motivation and ingestive behavior have been reported [20-22]. For example, sucrose, high fat, or alcohol intake produces dopamine release in the NAcc [23-25]. Recently we reported that electrical stimulation of the NAcc modulates taste responses of gustatory neurons in the PbN using in vivo recording [26].

An immediate early gene c-fos, encoding the nuclear protein c-Fos, is used as a metabolic marker of brain activity [27, 28]. Sucrose sham feeding-induced c-Fos expression was observed in the NAcc as well as in other forebrain gustatory nuclei such as LH and CeA [29]. Intraventricular injection of alcohol produced c-Fos expression in various nuclei related with feeding regulation, including the PbN [30]. The purpose of the present investigation is to examine c-Fos-like immunoreactivity (cFLI) in the PbN and NAcc in response to sucrose, ethanol (EtOH), and sucrose and EtOH mixture, applied to the tongue and the relationship among them using immunocytochemistry.

Materials and Methods

Animal and Stimulation

The experimental procedure was approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Gangneung-Wonju National University (GWNU2011-22). We used male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, weighing between 240~440 g (Orient Bio, Korea). SD rats were raised in the animal facility with free access of tap water and chow more than a week before the experiment. On the experiment day, the rat was anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of Zoletil 50 (Virbac, France, 0.1 mL/100 g) and Rompun (Bayer Korea, 0.02 mL/100 g). The tongue was pulled out using forceps with dull tip, and stimulation solution-soaked cotton pad was put on it for 30 mins. The body temperature was maintained using a heating pad (Harvard apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) during the stimulation. Stimulation solutions were 0.5 M sucrose, 10% ethanol (EtOH), and mixture of 0.5 M sucrose and 10% EtOH (sucrose/EtOH). The double-distilled water (DDW) was used as control. The data from 5 rats of each of stimulation group (sucrose, EtOH, sucrose/EtOH), and 3 rats from DDW group were analyzed.

Immunocytochemistry

Rat was anesthetized deeply with urethane (30%, 0.4 mL/100 g, i.p.) 1 hr after stimulation and perfused through the heart with 400 mL heparin-saline and then 4% formalin. The brain was cut into two pieces at the level of the midbrain. They were post-fixed in 4% formalin at 4°C for 2~24 hr and kept in 30% sucrose for 2~3 days at 4°C. The fixed brain was made into a cutting block using OCT compound (Frozen Section Compound, Leica, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and frozen at –75°C. We cut the brain in two blocks for cryosectioning considering the distance between the NAcc and PbN. Therefore, sucrose and OCT compound infiltrated thoroughly the brain more easily. The brain was sectioned at 30 μm in the coronal plane using cryostat (Cryostat, Leica, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), and the sections were collected in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

The brain sections were rinsed for 10 mins in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) for three times. Three times rinsing in PBS were done between each treatment in following procedures. The sections were incubated in 0.01% NaBH4 and 0.3% H2O2 for 30 mins and then in 0.25% Triton X-100 and 2% Nomal Goat Serum (NGS) for 2 hrs. Next, the tissues were incubated in 0.25% Triton X-100 + 2% NGS + c-fos polyclonal antibody (anti c-fos Rabbit, Calbiochem, Billerica, MA, USA) overnight. The concentration of c-fos antibody solution was 1:320. Then, the tissues were incubated in 0.25% Triton X-100 + 2% NGS + secondary antibody (1:2000, Biotinylates goat anti Rabbit, Vector labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 2 hrs. After that, the tissues were incubated in 0.5% Triton X-100 + ABC complex (1:166, Vector labs) for 1 hr. Finally the sections were treated in 0.04% diaminobenzidine + 0.04% ammonium nickel chloride + 0.02% H2O2 for 1~2 mins and then moved in PBS for washing. The brain sections were mounted on slide glasses and dried overnight. On the following day, the slides were briefly immersed in DDW and then in neutral red solution for 2 mins. The tissue sections were dehydrated in a series of alcohol and then in xylene twice. The tissue sections were cover slipped using Permount (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), and solutions were made in 0.01 M PBS unless addressed otherwise. The procedures were done at room temperature unless addressed otherwise.

Analysis

The brain sections were examined using a light microscope (Nikon, Japan). The number of cells expressing cFLI was counted using a program (NIS-Elemetns Br, Nikon, Japan) on computer connected to the microscope. Differences in number of cFLI between stimulation and DDW groups were compared using t-test or oneway ANOVA. All means were reported with SE unless addressed otherwise.

Results

We used a total of 44 rats which consisted of 11 in sucrose, 13 in EtOH and sucrose/EtOH groups, and 7 in DDW group. The NAcc is located in the ventral forebrain whereas the PbN is located in the pons of the brain stem. We examined cFLI in the PbNs and NAccs. As for the PbN sections, we tried to collect sections from the brain plane where the locus coeruleus starts to appear and to where the accessory trigeminal nucleus begins to appear. This area is relatively caudal part of the PbN, which is known to receive projections from the NST and gustatory neurons are recorded. The PbN can be classified into medial and lateral PbN. We counted number of cells with cFLI in the medial PbN because gustatory neurons are located mostly in the medial part. Fig. 1A shows the atlas brain section of the PbN, and photos in Fig. 2 demonstrate cFLI in the PbNs. The medial PbN is located medial and ventral to superior cerebellar peduncle and dorsal and lateral to mesencepahlic trigeminal nucleus.

jbtr-16-1-29-g1
Fig. 1. Diagram of atlas section showing the parabrachial nuclei in the pons (A) and nucleus accumbens in the ventral forebrain (B). 4V, fourth ventricle; aca, anterior commissure, anterior part; CGPn, central gray of the pons; CPu, caudate putamen; LC, locus coeruleus; LSI, lateral septal nucleus, intermediate part ; Me5, mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus; MPB, medial parabrachial nucleus; NAcCo, accumbens nucleus, core; NAcSh, accumbens nucleus, shell; NDB, nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca; scp, superior cerebella peduncle. Scale bars=500 μm in (A) and 1 mm in (B).
Download Original Figure
jbtr-16-1-29-g2
Fig. 2. Photographs showing the cFLI in the PbNs, in response to 0.5 M sucrose, 10% EtOH, a mixture of sucrose and EtOH, and DDW. Scale bar=500 μm.
Download Original Figure

The NAcc can be classified into core and shell region.

We counted cFLI in the shell region of the NAcc because the shell area is associated with ingestive behavior. The shell region of NAcc is medial to anterior commissure and outer of the core region. Fig. 1B shows the atlas brain section of the NAcc, and Fig. 3 illustrates immunostained tissues of the NAcc. We collected tissues from the section where the anterior commissure starts to locate lateral to the lateral ventricle, until it is located in the lateral margin of the core region of the NAcc. Although 44 SD rats were experimented, some brain block was trimmed out of the target areas, and some tissues were damaged during the immunostaining. Thus, the analysis was done with the data from 18 animals (6~10 week-olds and mean weight is 431.50 ± 12.22 g), 5 animals for east stimulation group and 3 for DDW group.

jbtr-16-1-29-g3
Fig. 3. Photographs showing the cFLI in the NAcc, in response to 0.5 M sucrose, 10% EtOH, a mixture of sucrose and EtOH, and DDW. Scale bar=1 mm.
Download Original Figure

We compared cFLI among sucrose, EtOH, and sucrose/EtOH groups with cFLI in DDW groups in the PbN and NAcc, respectively. We did not distinguish the left and right of the tongue when stimulated. However, we marked the brain sections by the left and right. We compared the number of cFLI in the left and right PbNs by ANOVA. The difference between the both was not statistically significant (F[1, 24]=0.005, P=0.946). The difference between left and right NAcc was also insignificant (F[1, 24]=0.022, P=0.885). Therefore, we included the number of cFLI in the left and right PbN and NAcc for analysis.

Table 1 shows the mean (± S.E.) number of cFLI in each group. The number in the parenthesis indicates the number of cFLI of stimulation group minus that of DDW group. In the PbN, cFLI in sucrose group was significantly greater than that in DDW group (t=4.685, df=14, P<0.01). The number of cFLI in EtOH group (t=2.850, df=14, P<0.05) and sucrose/EtOH group was also greater than that of DDW group (t=2.831, df=14, P< 0.05). However, the comparison among three stimulation groups was not statistically significant (F[2, 29]=0.004, P=0.996). In the NAcc, the difference in the number of cFLI in stimulation groups and DDW group and among stimulation groups was not statistically significant (F[2, 24]=1.198, P=0.319).

Table 1. Mean number of cFos-like immunoreactivity in the PbN and NAcc
PbN NAcc
Sucrose 12.25 ± 1.08 (6.97 ± 1.08)* 5.21 ± 0.52 (0.63 ± 0.52)
EtOH 12.46 ± 1.89 (7.18 ± 1.89)* 5.28 ± 0.76 (0.7 ± 0.76)
Sucrose + EtOH 12.40 ± 1.65 (7.12 ± 1.65)* 4.09 ± 0.40 (-0.49 ± 0.40)
Distilled H2O 5.28 ± 0.62 4.58 ± 0.854

The numbers in the parenthesis indicate the mean of cFLI, after substracting the number of cFLI of DDW group from that of each stimulation group. *indicates that the mean number of each stimulus group is significantly different from that of DDW group (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table

Discussion

We compared the number of cFLI among sucrose, EtOH, and sucrose/EtOH groups with the number of cFLI in DDW group in the PbN and NAcc in the present study. The stimulation was applied to the anterior tongue. The access of the posterior tongue was difficult and most previous in vivo recording data were also obtained in response to the anterior tongue stimulation [31, 32]. Taste information from the anterior tongue is transmitted by chorda tympani nerve to the NST which is the first taste nucleus of the central taste pathway [4]. Majority of taste-responsive neurons in the NST send projections to the PbN, which transfers taste information to the rostral brain in two tracts [4, 6]. In addition to thalamocortical tract which transmits taste information to the gustatory cortex, the PbN projects to various nuclei in the ventral forebrain, such as LH and CeA [4, 8, 33]. The LH and CeA are related to ingestive behavior and well connected with the NAcc, which is reported to participate in regulation of feeding behavior as well [17-19]. For example, sucrose induced cFLI in the NAcc, LH, and CeA [29] or increased dopamine release in the NAcc [34].Previously in vivo electrophysiological studies reported that sucrose-responsive neurons also responded to EtOH in the NST and PbN [15, 16]. Considering the results of these investigations, we hypothesized that there would be some overlapping of sucrose-responsive and EtOH-responsive neurons in the PbN and possibly in the NAcc. If the same neurons respond to sucrose and EtOH, the number of cFLI in response to sucrose/EtOH will be less than the sum of the number of sucrose-induced and EtOH-induced cFLI. To test this hypothesis, we compared cFLIs in response to sucrose and/or EtOH application in the present experiment.

The result of the present study did not clearly demonstrate whether the same neuronal population was activated by sucrose and EtOH. The number of cFLI in response to sucrose, EtOH, and sucrose/EtOH was not different from each other. It might suggest that the same pontine neurons responded to sucrose and EtOH. However, it is not likely because some, but not all, sucrose-responsive pontine neurons responded to EtOH in the previous study [15]. In addition, stimulation-induced cFLI in the NAcc was not different from DDW-induced cFLI. We applied stimulation solution by putting stimulation-soaked cotton on the tongue of the anesthetized animal in the present study. Although most of c-Fos expression following oral stimulation of taste solutions were examined in free moving animals [35, 36], Cartens and colleagues reported that the application of EtOH to the tongue induced c-Fos expression in the brainstem [37]. Further study, in which intra-oral injection of stimuli is applied to live animal to induce c-Fos expression, may prove the hypothesis of the present study.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2011-0015081).

REFERENCES

1.

Berridge KC. Pleasures of the brain. Brain Cogn. 2003; 52:106-128.

2.

Bray GA, Paeratakul S, Popkin BM. Dietary fat and obesity: a review of animal, clinical and epidemiological studies. Physiol Behav. 2004; 83:549-555.

3.

Thiele TE, Navarro M, Sparta DR, Fee JR, Knapp DJ, Cubero I. Alcoholism and obesity: overlapping neuropeptide pathways?. Neuropeptides. 2003; 37:321-337.

4.

RF Lundy JrR Norgren Gustatory System. In: Paxinos G, editor. The Rat Nervous System. 3rd ed Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. 2004; p. 891-921.

5.

Whitehead MC. Anatomy of the gustatory system in the hamster: synaptology of facial afferent terminals in the solitary nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1986; 244:72-85.

6.

Cho YK, Li CS, Smith DV. Gustatory projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the parabrachial nuclei in the hamster. Chem Senses. 2002; 27:81-90.

7.

Norgren R, Leonard CM. Taste pathways in rat brainstem. Science. 1971; 173:1136-1139.

8.

Norgren R, Leonard CM. Ascending central gustatory pathways. J Comp Neurol. 1973; 150:217-237.

9.

Norgren R. Gustatory afferents to ventral forebrain. Brain Res. 1974; 81:285-295.

10.

Norgren R. Taste pathways to hypothalamus and amygdala. J Comp Neurol. 1976; 166:17-30.

11.

Halsell CB. Organization of parabrachial nucleus efferents to the thalamus and amygdala in the golden hamster. J Comp Neurol. 1992; 317:57-78.

12.

Moga MM, Saper CB, Gray TS. Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis: cytoarchitecture, immunohistochemistry, and projection to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1989; 283:315-332.

13.

van der Kooy D, Koda LY, McGinty JF, Gerfen CR, Bloom FE. The organization of projections from the cortex, amygdala, and hypothalamus to the nucleus of the solitary tract in rat. J Comp Neurol. 1984; 224:1-24.

14.

Whitehead MC, Bergula A, Holliday K. Forebrain projections to the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract in the hamster. J Comp Neurol. 2000; 422:429-447.

15.

Cho YK. Relationship between alcohol and sucrose thermal stimulation in pontine taste neurons in the hamster. Exp Neurobiol. 2007; 16:79-87.

16.

Lemon CH, Brasser SM, Smith DV. Alcohol activates a sucrose-responsive gustatory neural pathway. J Neuro physiol. 2004; 92:536-544.

17.

Brog JS, Salyapongse A, Deutch AY, Zahm DS. The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J Comp Neurol. 1993; 338:255-278.

18.

Wood RI, Swann JM. The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the Syrian hamster: subnuclei and connections of the posterior division. Neuroscience. 2005; 135:155-179.

19.

Hasue RH, Shammah-Lagnado SJ. Origin of the dopaminergic innervation of the central extended amygdala and accumbens shell: a combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2002; 454:15-33.

20.

Di Chiara G. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 137:75-114.

21.

Loriaux AL, Roitman JD, Roitman MF. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106:1537-1544.

22.

Norgren R, Hajnal A, Mungarndee SS. Gustatory reward and the nucleus accumbens. Physiol Behav. 2006; 89:531-535.

23.

Hajnal A, Norgren R. Sucrose sham feeding decreases accumbens norepinephrine in the rat. Physiol Behav. 2004; 82:43-47.

24.

Hajnal A, Smith GP, Norgren R. Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 286:R31-R37.

25.

Liang NC, Hajnal A, Norgren R. Sham feeding corn oil increases accumbens dopamine in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006; 291:R1236-R1239.

26.

Li CS, Chung S, Lu DP, Cho YK. Descending projections from the nucleus accumbens shell suppress activity of taste-responsive neurons in the hamster parabrachial nuclei. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 108:1288-1298.

27.

Dragunow M, Faull R. The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J Neurosci Meth ods. 1989; 29:261-265.

28.

Hunt SP, Pini A, Evan G. Induction of c-fos-like protein in spinal cord neurons following sensory stimulation. Nature. 1987; 328:632-634.

29.

Mungarndee SS, Lundy RF, Norgren R. Expression of Fos during sham sucrose intake in rats with central gustatory lesions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008; 295:R751-R763.

30.

Chang SL, Patel NA, Romero AA. Activation and desensitization of Fos immunoreactivity in the rat brain following ethanol administration. Brain Res. 1995; 679:89-98.

31.

Li CS, Cho YK. Efferent projection from the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suppresses activity of taste-responsive neurons in the hamster parabrachial nuclei. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006; 291:R914-R926.

32.

Lundy Jr RF, Norgren R. Pontine gustatory activity is altered by electrical stimulation in the central nucleus of the amygdala. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85:770-783.

33.

Norgren R, Wolf G. Projections of thalamic gustatory and lingual areas in the rat. Brain Res. 1975; 92:123-129.

34.

Hajnal A, Norgren R. Taste pathways that mediate accumbens dopamine release by sapid sucrose. Physiol Behav. 2005; 84:363-369.

35.

DiNardo LA, Travers JB. Distribution of fos-like immunoreactivity in the medullary reticular formation of the rat after gustatory elicited ingestion and rejection behaviors. J Neurosci. 1997; 17:3826-3839.

36.

Travers SP. Quinine and citric acid elicit distinctive Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat nucleus of the solitary tract. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 282:R1798-R1810.

37.

Carstens E, Saxe I, Ralph R. Brainstem neurons expressing c-Fos immunoreactivity following irritant chemical stimulation of the rat's tongue. Neuroscience. 1995; 69:939-953.