ARTICLE

Use of Amplatz® canine duct occluder for closing a patent ductus arteriosus in a small-sized dog

Damin Jeong, Minhee Kang, Changmin Lee, Seunggon Kim, Sahee Min, Taeyeun Hahn, Heemyung Park
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea
Corresponding author: Heemyung Park, Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea, Tel: +82-2-450-4140, E-mail: parkhee@konkuk.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine Chungbuk National University. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 29, 2014; Revised: Aug 25, 2014; Accepted: Sep 5, 2014

Abstract

A 2-year-old intact female pomeranian dog presented dyspnea, labored breathing, cough, exercise intolerance, machinery heart murmur, and precordial thrill. A left-to-right patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) was diagnosed based on two-dimensional echocardiography, thoracic radiography, electrocardiography, and blood work. An angiography was performed to accurately evaluate the size and shape of the duct. An interventional approach for transcatheterial occlusion of the PDA was achieved using an Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder (ACDO), which is a commercially available ductal occluding device. Due to the limited size of the dog’s femoral artery, a device smaller [125% of minimal ductal diameter (MDD); recommended size: 150~200% of MDD] than recommended was mounted. After placement of the ACDO, precordial thrill and continuous heart murmur disappeared, and the patient was discharged the next day after stabilization with O2 supply. Upon follow up examination, dyspnea, labored breathing, cough, exercise intolerance, and cardiomegaly were improved with no complications after the procedure. The ACDO was well maintained in position. This case represents successful clinical application of the Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder to achieve closure of a PDA using a slightly smaller device than the recommended size.

Keywords: Amplatz canine duct occluder (ACDO); patent ductus arteriosus; transcatheter closure; small; dogs

Introduction

patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is the most common congenital cardiac deformity that is rectifiable, and it is identified by the presence of abnormal shunting vessels between the aorta and the pulmonary artery. It occurs with high prevalence in young female dogs of small breed [5, 9]. Surgical occlusion via thoracotomy is traditional method of treating PDA. However, due to the invasive nature of surgical occlusion, minimally invasive transcatheterial occlusion is becoming more popular [10]. There are three methods of trans-catheterization; occlusion can be achieved by coil embolization or by implantation of an Amplatz® Vascular plug or an Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder (ACDO). Among them, transarterial coil embolization is the most common method of PDA occlusion, and traditionally, catheterization is performed via the femoral artery in small dogs with PDA. The use of the other two devices for PDA occlusion has been reported in the literature, and especially the ACDO has been developed to address the anatomical differences between canines and humans [1]. This case report presents the successful transarterial occlusion of PDA in a dog using an ACDO of a size that was smaller than the recommended size, which was chosen to accommodate small-sized dogs.

Case report

A two-year-old-2.53kg-intact female Pomeranian dog was referred due to a continuous heart murmur and precordial thrill. A 5-days history of dyspnea, cough and exercise-intolerance were also noted by the referring veterinarian. A grade V/VI machinery murmur was auscultated at the left base of the heart. Electrocardiogram revealed tall R waves and widening of the QRS amplitude. Bulging of the main pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein and descending aorta was present on thoracic radiographs. Echocardiography revealed left ventricular and atrial dilatation, and the fractional shortening was decreased (fractional shortening=25.9%, ejection=52.5%). The LA/AO ratio was 1.7 and the mitral regurgitation flow was 4.7 m/s. A structure suspected to be a duct was found (Figs. 1A and 1C), and turbulent flow at the MPA was demonstrated on color-doppler examination (Figs. 1B and 1D). Based on the result of the investigations, the dog was diagnosed with a PDA. For stabilization before the procedure, pimobendan (0.3 mg/kg, twice daily p.o.; Vetmedin®, Boehringer Ingelheim, Meda Manufacturing GmbH; Germany), furosemide (2 mg/kg, twice daily p.o.; Lasix; Handok, Seoul, Korea), theophylline (7.5 mg/kg twice daily p.o.; Theolan-B; Kunwha Pharm, Seoul, Korea) and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril (0.125 mg/kg once daily p.o.; Vasotop®P; Intervet International B.V., EU), were administered for one-week before the procedure.

jbtr-15-3-146-g1
Fig. 1. Evaluation of the PDA by two-dimensional echocardiography. A structure with regurgitant flow suspected to be a duct was found in the Rt. parasternal cranial view (A, B) and the Lt. parasternal cranial view (C, D).
Download Original Figure

The dog was premedicated with butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg, i.m.; Butophan; Myung Moon Pharm, Seoul, Korea) and acepromazine (0.025 mg/kg, i.m.; Sedaject; Samumedian Co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea). Anesthesia was induced with propofol (6 mg/kg, i.v.; Provive 1%; Claris Lifesciences Limited, India) and maintained with 2% isoflorane (Terrell; Pramal Critical Care Inc., USA) in oxygen. Electrocardiography, body temperature and non-invasive blood pressure recording were used to monitor the anesthesia. With the patient in the right lateral recumbent position, access to the femoral artery was obtained by the surgical isolation method. A 4-Fr vascular introducer (Check-Flo Performer® Introducer sets, Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) was inserted, followed by 4-Fr angiographic catheterization (Boston Scientific Corporation, MA, USA) into the descending aorta, with fluoroscopic guidance. An angiogram was taken after the injection of non-ionic contrast medium (Omnipaque; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 1~1.2 mL/kg), and a Type IIb PDA was seen between the descending aorta and the pulmonary artery, with distal narrowing in the ductal diameter [4]. The minimum ductal diameter was 4 mm (Fig. 2A), and an interventional treatment using a 5 mm transarterial Amplatz Canine Duct Occluder (Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder; Infiniti Medical, LCC, USA) was selected. For the occlusion, the angiocatheter was replaced by the delivery catheter (Flexor® Check-Flo Performer® Introducer, Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA), which was placed in the descending aorta and then introduced into the ductus. The ACDO was released at least 5 minutes after the proper position was attained (Fig. 2B). After deployment of ACDO, the cardiac murmur disappeared. Postoperative analgesia was administered by an injection of butorphanol (0.1 mg/kg, s.c., Butophan; Myung Moon Pharm, Seoul, Korea) and cefazolin (30 mg/kg, i.v., Korea Chorus Pharm, Seoul, Korea). Thoracic radiography and an electrocardiogram were performed to evaluate the position of the ACDO (Figs. 3A and 3B). The dog was discharged the following day without any complications and pimobendan (0.3 mg/kg, twice daily p.o.; Vetmedin®, Boehringer Ingelheim, Meda Manufacturing GmbH; Germany), furosemide (2 mg/kg, twice daily p.o.; Lasix; Handok, Seoul, Korea), theophylline (7.5 mg/kg twice daily p.o.; Theolan-B; Kunwha Pharm, Seoul, Korea) and ramipril (0.125 mg/kg once daily p.o.; Vasotop®P; Intervet international B.V., EU) were administered for two more weeks before re-examination.

jbtr-15-3-146-g2
Fig. 2. Fluoroscopic image in the patient with the right lateral recumbent position before PDA occlusion. (A); Large abnormal blood vessels were demonstrated between the descending aorta and the pulmonary artery (asterisk), indicating the presence of PDA. (B); Successful deployment was seen after ACDO detachment.
Download Original Figure
jbtr-15-3-146-g3
Fig. 3. Thoracic radiography after PDA occlusion by the ACDO. Cardiomegaly and dilation of the pulmonary arteries and veins indicate pulmonary overcirculation secondary to PDA were found on right lateral and ventrodorsal radiographs. After the occlusion, the ACDO was observed to be in the appropriate position (A, B).
Download Original Figure

The patient was referred back to the local hospital because of the geographical distance involved in attending this hospital, and to date, there has been no problem for at least 10 months.

Discussion

PDA is the most common congenital cardiac defect that can cause volume overload of the left heart, pulmonary overcirculation and left-congestive heart failure. If uncorrected, mortality due to the PDA within a 1-year period approaches 60% [11]. In human medicine, PDA transcatheterial occlusion is a popular treatment for this condition because of its high suitability for patients of varying ages and body sizes [6, 8]. In veterinary medicine, as previously documented [5, 9, 13], the traditional treatment for PDA has been surgical occlusion. However, various complications such as hemorrhage, recanalization and incomplete ligation can occur. Amongst these, hemorrhage which occurs more commonly with surgical ligation than with transarterial catheterial occlusion, is the most frequently encountered complication and it can be fatal [1]. Over the past decade, transarterial occlusion of PDA has become more common [3, 7, 10]. The benefits of ACDO compared to coil-embolization or vascular-plug occlusion include the ease of deployment, a highly complete occlusion rate, the ability to reposition of the device prior to release, the short duration of the procedure and the rapid postoperative recovery associated with this device [1]. ACDO can be used for large PDA occlusions, and requires a relatively specific delivery system [1, 3, 7, 10, 13]. Small dogs that weigh less than 2.5 kg present a problem for transarterial closure of PDA, because of the limitations of the femoral arterial approach [2].

In this case, an ACDO was selected in place of coil embolization or occlusion with a vascular plug. Owing to the size of the dog’s femoral artery, a 5 mm ACDO was selected. In principle, based on the measured diameter of the PDA, a 6 mm or 8 mm ACDO would have been required (the recommended size of the ACDO: 150~200% of the MDD) [1]. However, in this dog, the size of the duct was too large for occlusion with coil embolization, and as the owner had neglected giving surgical treatment to the dog [2], we conducted the ACDO procedure even though the size of the duct and the ACDO were not a perfect fit. The device was found to be in a stable position on postoperative radiography. No complications have yet been reported.

In conclusion, this case demonstrates that the use of an ACDO that is even smaller (125% of MDD) than the recommended size (150~200% of MDD) can be a safe and valuable treatment option in the transcatheterial occlusion of PDA in dogs.

REFERENCES

1.

Gordon SG, Saunders AB, Achen SE, Roland RM, Drourr LT, Hariu C, Miller MW. Transarterial ductal occlusion using the Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder in 40 dogs. J Vet Cardiol. 2010; 12 p. 85-92.

2.

Blossom JE, Bright JM, Griffiths LG. Transvenous occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus in 56 consecutive dogs. J Vet Cardiol. 2010; 12 p. 75-84.

3.

Hogan DF, Green HW, Sanders RA. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in a dog with a peripheral vascular occlusion device. J Vet Cardiol. 2006; 8 p. 139-143.

4.

Miller MW, Gordon SG, Saunders AB, Arsenault WG, Meurs KM, Lehmkuhl LB, Bonagura JD, Fox PR. An-giographic classification of patent ductus arteriosus morphology in the dog. J Vet Cardiol. 2006; 8 p. 109-114.

5.

Buchanan JW. In: Fox PR, Sisson D, Moïse NS, editors. Prevalence of cardiovascular disorders. Textbook of Canine and Feline Cardiology. 1999; 2nd edPhiladelphiaSaunders p. 457-470.

6.

Prieto LR, DeCamillo DM, Konrad DJ, Scalet-Longworth L, Latson LA. Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics. 1998; 101 p. 1020-1024.

7.

Nguyenba TP, Tobias AH. The Amplatz® canine duct occluder A novel device for patent ductus arteriosus oc-clusion. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology. 2007; 9 p. 109-117.

8.

Lloyd TR, Fedderly R, Mendelsohn AM, Sandhu SK, Beekman RH 3rd. Transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus with Gianturco coils. Circulation. 1993; 88 p. 1412-1420.

9.

Kittleson MD. In: Kittleson MD, Kienle RD, editors. Patent ductus arteriosus. Small Animal Cardiovascular Medicine. 1998; PhiladelphiaMosby p. 218-230.

10.

Glaus TM, Martin M, Boller M, Stafford Johnson M, Kutter A, Flückiger M, Tofeig M. Catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in dogs variation in ductal size requires different techniques. J Vet Cardiol. 2003; 5 p. 7-12.

11.

Strickland KN. In: Tilley LP, Smith FWK, Oyama MA, Sleeper MM, editors. Congenital heart disease. Manual of Canine and Feline Cardiology. 2008; 4th edMissouriSaunders p. 215-239.

12.

Goodrich KR, Kyles AE, Kass PH, Campbell F. Retrospective comparison of surgical ligation and transarterial catheter occlusion for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in two hundred and four dogs (1993-2003). Vet Surg. 2007; 36 p. 43-49.

13.

Kang MH, Kim SG, Hahn TY, Park HA, Min SH, Park JH, Kim TW, Park HM. Patent Ductus Arteriosus Occlusion with an Amplatz® Canine Duct Occluder in a Dog. J Vet Clin. 2012; 29 p. 498-501.