Journal of Biomedical Translational Research
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University
Original Article

Effect of ethyl pyruvate on the artificial insemination liquid of boar spermatozoa

Malavi Arachchi Gamage Nayodya Dananjanee Malavi Arachchi Gamage1https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3194-6548, Wijesooriya Mudhiyanselage Nadeema Dissanayake1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7130-7737, Young-Joo Yi1,*http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7167-5123
1Department of Agricultural Education, College of Education, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea
2Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*Corresponding author: Young-Joo Yi, Department of Agricultural Education, College of Education, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea, Tel: +82-61-750-3352, E-mail: yiyj@scnu.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University.

Received: May 28, 2025; Revised: Jun 16, 2025; Accepted: Jun 17, 2025

Abstract

The success of artificial insemination (AI) in the swine industry relies on conserving the quality of boar sperm during liquid storage, as boar spermatozoa are prone to oxidative stress due to the high polyunsaturated fatty acid content and lack of antioxidant defenses. Sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity, and DNA stability are all affected by the increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) during storage, which lowers fertility. Ethyl pyruvate (EP), a stable derivative of pyruvate, has good antioxidant properties and has been shown to protect sperm quality in vivo. Its effects on boar sperm during in vitro preservation have not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of different concentrations of EP (0.1–1 mM) in Beltsville thawing solution at 17°C on the sperm quality parameters of boar spermatozoa over five days. Changes in sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity, chromatin stability, and ROS were observed. The results showed that boar spermatozoa stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP showed a significant increase in sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity, and chromatin stability compared with the control (without EP) and 1 mM EP for 5 days. Compared to the control and 1 mM EP, ROS levels statistically decreased in sperm stored in 0.25–0.75 mM EP on both storage days 3 and 5. Our findings demonstrated that 0.25–0.75 mM of EP could enhance the boar sperm quality and mitigate the oxidative stress during liquid storage, thus revealing a strategy to improve fertility rates during AI in pig production.

Keywords: ethyl pyruvate; spermatozoa; liquid storage; insemination, artificial; boar

INTRODUCTION

Artificial insemination (AI) is a widely used technique for animal reproduction in the livestock industry. Researchers are focusing on developing innovative methods for liquid preservation to enhance sperm quality [1]. Studies have shown that motility, viability, acrosome integrity, chromatin stability, and levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the primary parameters essential for maintaining sperm quality and fertilization ability [2]. During storage, metabolic pathways in the spermatozoa result in the production of byproducts including ROS, superoxide anion, and hydrogen peroxide [3]. The excessive generation of byproducts in an in vitro environment decreases sperm quality and affects fertilization [4]. Therefore, it is crucial to include relevant substances in semen extenders to mitigate the negative impact of these byproducts [5]. Importantly, these substances should be capable of maintaining energy production and redox potential to ensure sperm quality [6].

The addition of antioxidants to semen extenders is a common approach used to maintain the boar sperm quality during prolonged storage [7, 8]. Antioxidants, including fish oil, vitamin E, organic selenium, and ginseng extract, have been proven to enhance antioxidant activity and maintain the quality of boar spermatozoa during storage [913]. Pyruvate is a natural substance produced as the final product of glycolysis. However, it is unstable in an aqueous solution. To resolve this issue, ethyl pyruvate (EP) was synthesized as a stable derivative of pyruvate [14, 15]. Research studies have shown that EP provides biological and pharmacological benefits, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, in both in vivo and in vitro research models [14, 16]. EP is associated with energy metabolism in cells, during which ROS are produced. Overproduction of ROS can damage cellular components, like DNA. EP has the ability to remove or neutralize the excess ROS [1618]. In one study, EP was administered to mice with phenylhydrazine (PHZ)-induced hemolytic anemia and the sperm quality parameters were examined in comparison to the PHZ-only treated group [19]. The EP-treated group showed higher sperm motility, viability, and improved sperm morphology compared to the PHZ-induced hemolytic anemia group. These effects were attributed to the free radical scavenging ability of EP [19]. Similarly, administration of EP to cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress mice significantly increased sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology, and reduced DNA damage compared with the cyclophosphamide-only treated group [11].

Research studies have investigated the effect of EP on the sperm quality parameters of animals in vivo. However, no studies have been conducted to assess its effects on boar spermatozoa in vitro. Therefore, there is a research gap with respect to the effect of EP on boar spermatozoa during sperm preservation. The current study investigated the effect of EP on the quality parameters of boar spermatozoa during storage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation and storage of boar semen

Freshly collected boar semen samples from adult Duroc boars with sperm motility exceeding 80% were purchased from the local AI center. Boar sperm was washed and extended in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS), supplemented with different concentrations of EP (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 mM), or placed in a control group (without EP). EP concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 1 mM were selected based on preliminary experiments using boar sperm to evaluate their effects on sperm quality during storage. The samples were subjected to storage at 17°C for 5 days.

Measurement of sperm motility

Sperm motility parameters were evaluated using a computer-assisted sperm analyzer (CASA, Sperm Class Analyzer, Microptic S.L., Barcelona, Spain). Before measuring the sperm motility, the Leja chamber slide was pre-warmed at 37°C. Subsequently, a 2 µL sample was placed into chamber slides (Leja Products B.V., Nieuw-Vennep, The Netherlands) and ten optical fields were analyzed, encompassing a total of not less than 500 spermatozoa. The CASA system assessed the following as motion kinetic parameters: progressive motility, linearity index, straightness index, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, oscillation index, and average path velocity.

Sperm viability

Spermatozoa were rinsed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PBS-PVA). Viability was determined by employing the sperm viability kit (LIVE/DEAD®, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). First, spermatozoa were centrifuged at room temperature (RT) for 5 min, and then the supernatant was removed. Following that, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer was added to the sperm pellet and incubated with the SYBR14 stain (100 nM) for 5 min. Propidium iodide (PI, 10 μM) was added to the sample, and it was incubated for 5 min. The stained samples were mounted with a mounting medium and examined using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and images were captured (DS-Fi2, Nikon). Live sperm cells appeared green, while dead cells appeared red.

Acrosome integrity

Spermatozoa were centrifuged twice with PBS at RT for 5 min each. After centrifugation, the spermatozoa were placed onto the slides. For cell fixation, the slides were incubated in 95% ethanol at 4°C for 30 min, after which the slides were allowed to air dry completely. For acrosome staining, fixed spermatozoa were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-Pisum sativum agglutinin (FITC-PSA) at RT for 8–10 min. After incubation, the excess staining solution was removed, and the slides were subjected to three washes with PBS [20]. The samples were subsequently monitored under a fluorescence microscope coupled with an imaging system (Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope, Nikon). Spermatozoa exhibiting green fluorescence localized to the acrosome region were defined as intact acrosomes, while those lacking/absent green fluorescence were classified as acrosome-reacted or damaged.

Chromatin stability

Spermatozoa were centrifuged twice with PBS at RT for 5 min each. After centrifugation, spermatozoa were placed onto the slides. To fix the cells, the slides were incubated with Carnoy’s solution (methanol: glacial acetic acid = 3:1) for 15 min at 4°C and then air dried. The fixed slides were then incubated in a tampon solution (80 mM citric acid, 15 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate [Na2HPO4], pH 2.5) at 75°C for 5 min. Once cooled to RT, the slides were incubated with acridine orange solution (0.2 mg/mL) for 5 min at RT. The excess stain was gently tapped off, and the slides were subjected to two successive washes with distilled water [21]. The samples were then explored under a fluorescence microscope equipped with an imaging system (Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope, Nikon). Sperm emitting green fluorescence were classified as having normal chromatin integrity, while those showing yellow to red fluorescence were considered to have denatured DNA.

Reactive oxygen species

The spermatozoa were centrifuged twice with 0.1 PBS-PVA at RT for 5 min. The sperm pellet was then resuspended with 0.1 PBS-PVA solution and incubated with 1 µM 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (carboxy-H2DCFDA, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) at 37°C for 10 min. Following incubation, the spermatozoa were subjected to two washes with PBS and mounted on the slides [22]. ROS production was then examined under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope, Nikon).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA via the GraphPad PRISM® software (San Diego, CA, USA). Our study utilized a completely randomized design, and significant differences between groups were assessed using Tukey’s multiple comparison test and the t-test. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. and statistical significance was set at *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.

RESULTS

Sperm motility increased in the presence of ethyl pyruvate during storage

Sperm motility of boar spermatozoa was measured over 5 days in liquid storage without EP (control) and with EP (0.1–1 mM). On day 1 of storage, no statistically significant differences in motility were detected among the EP groups compared to the control. However, on day 3, a notable increase in motility was observed in the 0.5–0.75 mM EP groups compared to the control and 1 mM EP groups (79.6%–80.4% in the control vs. 84.5%–87.3% in 0.5–0.75 mM EP, p<0.05 and p<0.001; Fig. 1). On day 5, the sperm stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP also showed significantly higher motility compared to the control and 1 mM EP group (70.7%–70% vs. 76.7%–82.5%, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 1). Notably, the highest motility was detected in sperm stored with 0.5 mM EP on both days 3 and 5. Furthermore, the EP-exposed groups exhibited marked improvements in motion kinetic parameters, including progressive motility, linearity index, straightness index, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, oscillation index, and average path velocity compared to the control group during storage (p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Table 1).

jbtr-26-2-47-g1
Fig. 1. Sperm motility was examined at 17°C for 5 days. Boar spermatozoa were stored in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS) with different concentrations (0.1–1 mM) of ethyl pyruvate (EP) or control without EP. The values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Table 1. Effect of ethyl pyruvate (EP) on sperm motion kinematics on different storage days
Storage (day) Parameters1) Ethyl pyruvate (mM) p-value2)
0 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 vs. 0.1 mM 0 vs. 0.25 mM 0 vs. 0.5 mM 0 vs. 0.75 mM 0 vs. 1 mM
1 PR (%) 80.5 ± 1.0 81.0 ± 2.6 81.8 ± 1.6 80.5 ± 0.2 82.2 ± 1.4 82.2 ± 0.5 0.999 0.992 0.999 0.977 0.976
LIN (%) 24.9 ± 0.8 26.1 ± 0.8 28.7 ± 1.5 27.0 ± 2.2 28.7 ± 1.5 27.2 ± 1.5 0.999 0.999 0.992 0.398 0.895
STR (%) 53.4 ± 1.4 54.0 ± 0.7 54.1 ± 2.1 53.9 ± 1.4 52.4 ± 2.6 53.3 ± 0.6 0.997 0.997 0.999 0.971 0.999
WOB (%) 53.0 ± 0.9 57.0 ± 3.4 54.8 ± 2.0 52.8 ± 2.3 54.5 ± 2.8 50.8 ± 1.6 0.327 0.933 0.999 0.959 0.857
VCL (µm/s) 74.1 ± 0.7 71.3 ± 2.6 68.8 ± 2.0 73.3 ± 1.3 76.9 ± 2.4 80.0 ± 2.8 0.615 0.066 0.997 0.593 0.532
VSL (µm/s) 13.4 ± 1.2 13.8 ± 2.5 13.9 ± 0.5 14.4 ± 2.5 14.0 ± 0.8 13.5 ± 2.1 0.999 0.998 0.977 0.997 0.998
VAP (µm/s) 29.1 ± 0.4 31.3 ± 1.4 26.9 ± 1.4 28.7 ± 0.9 28.0 ± 3.5 31.0 ± 1.5 0.900 0.995 0.999 0.995 0.925
3 PR (%) 63.2 ± 1.4 63.9 ± 2.3 69.9 ± 2.7 75.5 ± 0.5 69.9 ± 2.7 63.3 ± 1.4 0.999 0.055 0.000 0.050 0.999
LIN (%) 41.9 ± 1.5 38.5 ± 1.4 30.9 ± 0.5 33.1 ± 1.5 35.8 ± 0.5 37.3 ± 1.6 0.517 0.000 0.001 0.040 0.201
STR (%) 52.6 ± 2.8 56.3 ± 0.7 59.9 ± 0.7 63.9 ± 0.4 53.7 ± 0.7 50.1 ± 1.7 0.052 0.000 0.000 0.963 0.455
WOB (%) 65.9 ± 1.0 70.8 ± 0.3 56.1 ± 1.1 57.0 ± 1.2 60.97 ±2.5 63.8 ± 0.9 0.123 0.000 0.000 0.111 0.881
VCL (µm/s) 53.5 ± 1.3 59.0 ± 0.8 59.0 ± 0.6 68.1 ± 0.8 58.1 ± 1.1 50.7 ± 1.0 0.051 0.049 0.000 0.132 0.541
VSL (µm/s) 10.9 ± 0.5 12.0 ± 2.0 12.0 ± 0.8 14.1 ± 0.7 12.4 ± 1.6 9.2 ± 0.5 0.954 0.949 0.207 0.856 0.826
VAP (µm/s) 16.0 ± 0.7 14.2 ± 2.3 17.5 ± 1.5 21.7 ± 0.8 18.7 ± 0.2 15.6 ± 0.7 0.940 0.967 0.088 0.999 0.557
5 PR (%) 50.9 ± 0.9 53.9 ± 1.0 55.3 ± 1.2 61.0 ± 0.7 58.9 ± 0.7 52.2 ± 2.8 0.626 0.232 0.000 0.005 0.979
LIN (%) 33.0 ± 1.4 46.0 ± 1.4 47.6 ± 1.5 40.2 ± 0.5 41.6 ± 1.4 41.2 ± 2.0 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.003
STR (%) 60.6 ± 0.6 61.9 ± 0.8 63.3 ± 1.5 66.1 ± 0.7 59.4 ± 1.1 60.7 ± 0.7 0.915 0.371 0.008 0.952 0.999
WOB (%) 69.1 ± 0.4 67.5 ± 1.4 66.7 ± 1.1 58.8 ± 0.4 67.9 ± 2.1 69.7 ± 0.7 0.960 0.815 0.000 0.987 0.999
VCL (µm/s) 23.5 ± 1.5 25.1 ± 0.6 29.5 ± 1.3 30.5 ± 1.0 28.1 ± 0.8 26.2 ± 1.0 0.947 0.029 0.008 0.148 0.660
VSL (µm/s) 9.4 ± 0.7 10.8 ± 0.5 8.0 ± 0.7 13.1 ± 0.6 11.6 ± 1.4 7.1 ± 1.2 0.994 0.895 0.121 0.512 0.512
VAP (µm/s) 12.9 ± 0.5 10.1 ± 0.7 11.9 ± 0.9 17.2 ± 0.9 17.1 ± 2.2 15.6 ± 2.1 0.708 0.995 0.298 0.320 0.736

The experiments were conducted four times with four different boars. The results for sperm motility and motion kinematics are provided as mean ± S.E.M.

p-values represent the comparison between the control and EP-treated samples (0.1–1 mM).

PR, progressive sperm motility; LIN, linearity index; STR, straightness index; WOB, oscillation index; VCL, curvilinear velocity; VSL, straight line velocity; VAP, average path velocity.

Download Excel Table
Ethyl pyruvate supplementation led to increased sperm viability during liquid storage

Sperm viability was evaluated throughout the liquid storage, and no pronounced differences were detected between the EP groups and control on day 1 (Fig. 2). After 3 days of storage, viability was notably higher in sperm stored with 0.25-0.75 mM EP compared to both control and the 1 mM EP group (71.1%–73.8% in control vs. 77.5%–80.8% in 0.25–0.75 mM EP, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 2). Compared to the control, 0.5–0.75 mM EP had a significantly higher effect on viability on day 5 (66.5% in control vs. 71.6%–73.5% in 0.5–0.75 mM EP, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 2). Consistent with the motility results, the 0.5 mM EP group showed the highest viability among all EP groups in both days 3 and 5. However, storage with 0.1 and 1 mM did not significantly improve viability compared with the control on either day 3 or 5 of liquid storage.

jbtr-26-2-47-g2
Fig. 2. Examination of sperm viability. Boar spermatozoa were stored in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS) with different concentrations (0.1–1 mM) of ethyl pyruvate (EP) or control without EP at 17°C for 5 days of storage. The values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Acrosome integrity improved when stored with ethyl pyruvate

On day 1, there was no notable difference in the percentages of sperm with intact acrosome among the treatment groups (Fig. 3). By day 3, sperm stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP exhibited a significant increase in the percentage of intact acrosome relative to the control group (73.8% in control vs. 78.9%–81.3% in 0.25–0.75 mM EP, p<0.05 and p<0.001; Fig. 3). Likewise, on day 5, supplementation with 0.25–0.75 mM EP in the BTS solution significantly improved the percentage of intact acrosome (68.8% in control vs. 73.5%–76.8% in 0.25–0.75 mM EP, p<0.05 and p<0.001; Fig. 3).

jbtr-26-2-47-g3
Fig. 3. Evaluation of acrosome integrity at 17°C for 5 days. Boar spermatozoa were stored in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS) with different concentrations (0.1–1 mM) of ethyl pyruvate (EP) or control without EP. The values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Sperm DNA was conserved in Beltsville thawing solution with ethyl pyruvate during the storage

Chromatin stability was assessed over 5 days of storage. Consistent with the previous results, no differences were detected in the proportion of normal chromatin among the group on day 1 (Fig. 4). However, on day 3, sperm stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP exhibited a significantly higher proportion of normal chromatin (71.1% in control vs 77.9%–80.6% in 0.25–0.75 mM EP, p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 4). Sperm stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP showed a statistically higher proportion of normal chromatin compared to the control and 1 mM groups on day 5 of storage (71.1%–73.8% in control and 1 mM vs. 77.5%–80.8% in 0.25–0.75 mM EP, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 4). Notably, sperm stored with 0.5 mM EP showed the highest proportion of normal chromatin on days 3 and 5 (p<0.001; Fig. 4).

jbtr-26-2-47-g4
Fig. 4. Evaluation of chromatin stability in boar spermatozoa stored in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS) with different concentrations (0.1–1 mM) of ethyl pyruvate (EP) or control without EP at 17°C for 5 days. The values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
Download Original Figure
Reactive oxygen species was notably decreased in the presence of ethyl pyruvate during storage

A similar trend was observed in the ROS levels. On day 1, the ROS levels did not significantly differ among the treatment groups (Fig. 4). The ROS levels were significantly lower in sperm treated with 0.25–0.75 mM EP compared to the control and 1 mM EP on day 3 of storage (fluorescent intensity; 27.9–28.5 in control and 1 mM vs. 17.8-21.9 in 0.25 mM EP, p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 5). A similar trend was seen on day 5, in sperm stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP (27.9–28.5 in control and 1 mM vs. 17.8–21.9 in 0.25 mM EP, p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001; Fig. 5).

jbtr-26-2-47-g5
Fig. 5. Levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were examined in boar spermatozoa stored in Beltsville thawing solution (BTS) with different concentrations (0.1–1 mM) of ethyl pyruvate (EP) or control without EP at 17°C for 5 days. The values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

Boar spermatozoa are susceptible to oxidative stress due to the high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids in their cell membranes and lower natural antioxidant defense capacity [23, 24]. As a result, boar spermatozoa are prone to reduced sperm motility, viability, and chromatin stability, along with increased ROS levels during liquid storage [25]. To reduce these effects, antioxidants are added to semen extenders to help maintain the quality of boar spermatozoa by decreasing excessive ROS production during liquid storage at 17°C [26].

AI is widely used as a successful breeding method in boars and improves fertility, genetics, and production. Liquid preservation of boar semen is a crucial component of AI [27]. Therefore, adding antioxidants to semen extenders is essential during storage to maintain sperm quality [28]. Research studies have used both synthetic and natural antioxidants, in vivo and in vitro, to improve boar sperm quality by reducing ROS production during storage [29]. Synthetic antioxidants that have been used include α-tocopherol, butylated hydroxytoluene, taurine, and selenium, while natural extracts such as rosmarinic acid, resveratrol, and Isatis root polysaccharide have also been tested [30].

EP is an ester formed by the condensation of pyruvic acid and can be used as a stable alternative to pyruvate. Researchers have demonstrated that EP has shown antioxidant potential in various cells and tissues, including the testicular tissue in mammals in in vivo studies [31]. Pyruvate is an essential component of the metabolic pathways in cells. It is the end product of anaerobic glycolysis and serves as the starting substrate for the tricarboxylic acid cycle [32]. Both in vitro [33] and in vivo [34] research studies have found that EP is involved in metabolic activities by increasing ATP production and reducing oxidative stress in cells without breaking down into pyruvate.

Several in vivo studies have documented that EP has a protective effect on male reproductive functions. For example, EP administration to mice with cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress significantly improved epididymal sperm quality by enhancing sperm concentration, motility, viability, nucleus maturity, and chromatin stability, and led to lower ROS levels compared to cyclophosphamide-induced mice without EP treatment [11]. Similar approach where methotrexate was administered to mice to induce testicular toxicity, followed by treatment with EP showed increased sperm count, motility, viability, sperm maturity, and chromatin stability compared to the mice treated only with methotrexate [35]. Also, mice with PHZ-induced hemolytic anemia were treated with EP and found to reduce the DNA damage in sperm [19].

In our study, we found that motility and chromatin stability were increased in boar spermatozoa stored with 0.25–0.75 mM EP compared to the control group on both days 3 and 5 of the storage period. Additionally, our results showed that significantly lower levels of ROS were observed in boar spermatozoa stored at EP concentrations 0.25–0.75 mM during storage days 3 and 5, indicating the antioxidant potential of EP in maintaining sperm quality during liquid storage. Our findings are consistent with previous studies in which EP reduced oxidative stress and improved sperm parameters in mammalian models with testicular toxicity [11, 35].

The improvement in sperm motility observed in our study may be in part due to the metabolic role of pyruvate derivatives. A study using human spermatozoa incubated with exogenous pyruvate and glucose reported elevated motility and capacitation during incubation. The authors revealed that the combined treatment promoted glycolysis, which contributed to the results [36].

Numerous studies have demonstrated that excessive levels of ROS trigger the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, leading to the disruption of the normal morphology of sperm, damage to the sperm DNA, and reduction in motility and viability, which are associated with lower success rates seen in in vitro fertilization [11, 37, 38]. According to our findings, reducing oxidative stress is crucial for sperm preservation, and the inclusion of EP in semen extenders can mitigate these negative effects.

In conclusion, our findings indicate that EP is an effective antioxidant for improving the quality of boar sperm during liquid storage. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies conducted to investigate the in vitro effects of EP on boar semen extenders under short-term storage conditions. Further research is needed to explore its effect during long-term storage and cryopreservation to evaluate its efficacy with other antioxidants for optimal extender formulations.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a research promotion program of Sunchon National University (SCNU).

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

References

1.

Rodriguez-Gil JE. Mammalian sperm energy resources management and survival during conservation in refrigeration. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006; 41:11-20

2.

Chianese R, Pierantoni R. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production alters sperm quality. Antioxidants. 2021; 10:92

3.

Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, Hedges A, McLachlan RI. Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25:2415-2426

4.

O’Flaherty C, Matsushita-Fournier D. Reactive oxygen species and protein modifications in spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2017; 97:577-585

5.

Kameni SL, Meutchieye F, Ngoula F. Liquid storage of ram semen: associated damages and improvement. Open J Anim Sci. 2021; 11:473-500

6.

Fraser L, Strzezek J. The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5oC and 16oC. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2004; 42:49-55

7.

Knox RV. The fertility of frozen boar sperm when used for artificial insemination. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015; 50:90-97

8.

Yehye WA, Rahman NA, Ariffin A, Abd Hamid SB, Alhadi AA, Kadir FA, Yaeghoobi M. Understanding the chemistry behind the antioxidant activities of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT): a review. Eur J Med Chem. 2015; 101:295-312

9.

Liu Q, Duan RJ, Zhou YF, Wei HK, Peng J, Li JL. Supplementing oregano essential oil to boar diet with strengthened fish oil: effects on semen antioxidant status and semen quality parameters. Andrologia. 2017; 49e12764

10.

Audet I, Laforest JP, Martineau GP, Matte JJ. Effect of vitamin supplements on some aspects of performance, vitamin status, and semen quality in boars. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82:626-633

11.

Bakhtiary Z, Shahrooz R, Ahmadi A, Zarei L. Protective effects of ethyl pyruvate on sperm quality in cyclophosphamide treated mice. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015; 13:291-296

12.

Horky P, Jancikova P, Sochor J, Hynek D, Chavis GJ, Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Cernei N, Zitka O, Zeman L, Adam V, Kizek R. Effect of organic and inorganic form of selenium on antioxidant status of breeding boars ejaculate revealed by electrochemistry. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012; 7:9643-9657

13.

Yun SJ, Bae GS, Park JH, Song TH, Choi A, Ryu BY, Pang MG, Kim EJ, Yoon M, Chang MB. Antioxidant effects of cultured wild ginseng root extracts on the male reproductive function of boars and guinea pigs. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 170:51-60

14.

Yang R, Zhu S, Tonnessen TI. Ethyl pyruvate is a novel anti-inflammatory agent to treat multiple inflammatory organ injuries. J Inflamm. 2016; 13:37

15.

Cruz RJ, Harada T, Sasatomi E, Fink MP. Effects of ethyl pyruvate and other α-keto carboxylic acid derivatives in a rat model of multivisceral ischemia and reperfusion. J Surg Res. 2011; 165:151-157

16.

Koprivica I, Djedovic N, Stojanović I, Miljković Đ. Ethyl pyruvate, a versatile protector in inflammation and autoimmunity. Inflamm Res. 2022; 71:169-182

17.

Sharifi-Rad M, Anil Kumar NV, Zucca P, Varoni EM, Dini L, Panzarini E, Rajkovic J, Tsouh Fokou PV, Azzini E, Peluso I, Prakash Mishra A, Nigam M, Rayess YE, Beyrouthy ME, Polito L, Iriti M, Martins N, Martorell M, Docea AO, Setzer WN, Calina D, Cho WC, Sharifi-Rad J. Lifestyle, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: back and forth in the pathophysiology of chronic diseases. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:694

18.

Newsholme P, Cruzat VF, Keane KN, Carlessi R, de Bittencourt PIH. Molecular mechanisms of ROS production and oxidative stress in diabetes. Biochem J. 2016; 473:4527-4550

19.

Mozafari AA, Shahrooz R, Ahmadi A, Malekinjad H, Mardani K. Protective effect of ethyl pyruvate on mice sperm parameters in phenylhydrazine induced hemolytic anemia. Vet Res Forum. 2016; 7:63-68

20.

Berger T. Pisum sativum agglutinin used as an acrosomal stain of porcine and caprine sperm. Theriogenology. 1990; 33:689-695

21.

Martins CF, Dode MN, Báo SN, Rumpf R. The use of the acridine orange test and the TUNEL assay to assess the integrity of freeze-dried bovine spermatozoa DNA. Genet Mol Res. 2007; 6:94-104

22.

Yi YJ, Adikari AADI, Moon ST, Lee SM, Heo JM. Effects of lipopolysaccharides on the maturation of pig oocytes. Korean J Agric Sci. 2021; 48:163-170

23.

Cerolini S, Maldjian A, Surai P, Noble R. Viability, susceptibility to peroxidation and fatty acid composition of boar semen during liquid storage. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 58:99-111

24.

Strzeżek J, Łapkiewicz S, Lecewicz M. A note on antioxidant capacity of boar seminal plasma. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 1999; 17:181-188

25.

Opuwari CS, Henkel RR. An update on oxidative damage to spermatozoa and oocytes. BioMed Res Int. 2016; 2016:9540142

26.

Yeste M. State-of-the-art of boar sperm preservation in liquid and frozen state. Anim Reprod. 2018; 14:69-81

27.

Knox RV. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 2016; 85:83-93

28.

Brzezińska-Ślebodzińska E, Ślebodziński AB, Pietras B, Wieczorek G. Antioxidant effect of vitamin E and glutathione on lipid peroxidation in boar semen plasma. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1995; 47:69-74

29.

Pezo F, Yeste M, Zambrano F, Uribe P, Risopatrón J, Sánchez R. Antioxidants and their effect on the oxidative/nitrosative stress of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Cryobiology. 2021; 98:5-11

30.

Ribas-Maynou J, Mateo-Otero Y, Delgado-Bermúdez A, Bucci D, Tamanini C, Yeste M, Barranco I. Role of exogenous antioxidants on the performance and function of pig sperm after preservation in liquid and frozen states: a systematic review. Theriogenology. 2021; 173:279-294

31.

Payabvash S, Kiumehr S, Tavangar SM, Dehpour AR. Ethyl pyruvate reduces germ cell–specific apoptosis and oxidative stress in rat model of testicular torsion/detorsion. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43:705-712

32.

Jijakli H, Nadi AB, Cook L, Best L, Sener A, Malaisse WJ. Insulinotropic action of methyl pyruvate: enzymatic and metabolic aspects. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996; 335:245-257

33.

Zeng J, Liu J, Yang GY, Kelly MJS, James TL, Litt L. Exogenous ethyl pyruvate versus pyruvate during metabolic recovery after oxidative stress in neonatal rat cerebrocortical slices. Anesthesiology. 2007; 107:630-640

34.

Woo YJ, Taylor MD, Cohen JE, Jayasankar V, Bish LT, Burdick J, Pirolli TJ, Berry MF, Hsu V, Grand T. Ethyl pyruvate preserves cardiac function and attenuates oxidative injury after prolonged myocardial ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127:1262-1269

35.

Atashfaraz E, Farokhi F, Najafi G. Protective effect of ethyl pyruvate on epididymal sperm characteristics, oxidative stress and testosterone level in methotrexate treated mice. J Reprod Infertil. 2013; 14:190

36.

Hereng TH, Elgstøen KBP, Cederkvist FH, Eide L, Jahnsen T, Skålhegg BS, Rosendal KR. Exogenous pyruvate accelerates glycolysis and promotes capacitation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26:3249-3263

37.

Saleh RA, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl. 2002; 23:737-752

38.

Aziz N, Saleh RA, Sharma RK, Lewis-Jones I, Esfandiari N, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Novel association between sperm reactive oxygen species production, sperm morphological defects, and the sperm deformity index. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81:349-354