Journal of Biomedical and Translational Research
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University
Original Article

Rotigotine protects dopaminergic neurons through dopamine D2 receptor against 6-hydroxydopamine

Si-joon Lee1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-687X, Mun-ki Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-2236, Chung-kil Won1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3105-1869
1Institute of Animal Medicine & Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2Laboratory Animal Center, Daegu Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu 41061, Korea
*Corresponding author: Chung-Kil Won, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea, Tel: +82-55-772-2351, Fax: +82-55-772-2349, E-mail: wonck@gnu.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University. All rights reserved.

Received: Oct 12, 2020; Accepted: Oct 23, 2020

Published Online: Dec 31, 2020

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) receptor (D1 and D2-like receptors) agonists are known to affect expression levels of DA receptors. Rotigotine, a DA D2-like receptor agonist, has been developed for treating Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, its role in PD by acting through DA D2-like receptors has not been fully understood yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate neuroprotective effects of rotigotine through DA D2 and D3 receptors in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) induced mouse model of PD. Expression level of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) was examined using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Results revealed that unilateral injection of 6-OHDA into the midbrain caused significant loss of TH positive cells in the substantia nigra, whereas rotigotine inhibited such loss of TH cells in 6-OHDA-induced mouse model of PD. In vitro experiments demonstrated that rotigotine increased expression levels of TH against 6-OHDA-induced toxicity. The expression level of TH after treatment with L’741,626, a D2 receptor antagonist was decreased more than that after treatment with GR 103691, a D3 receptor antagonist. These results suggest that rotigotine can protect DA neurons against 6-OHDA induced toxicity and that the protective effect of rotigotine for DAergic neurons through a DA D2 receptor is stronger than that through a DA D3 receptor.

Keywords: 6-hydroxydopamine; dopamine D2 receptor; Parkinson’s disease; rotigotine; tyrosine hydroxylase

Introduction

Dopamine (DA), an important catecholaminergic neurotransmitter, is involved in controlling diverse brain functions, including motor control, emotion, cognition, and reward behaviors [13]. DA neurons are located in the substantia nigra (SN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA). They send the major axonal projection and comprise the nigrostriatal pathway which is interconnected with the striatum and thought to control voluntary movements [4].

Dopaminergic receptors are divided into two subclasses: D1-like (including D1 and D5 receptors) and D2-like (including D2, D3, and D4 receptors) [5, 6]. Many dopamine receptor agonists have been developed to replace levodopa with an additional goal to provide more continuous dopaminergic stimulation [7]. Rotigotine, a DA D2-like receptor agonist, has been developed for treating Parkinson’s disease (PD) as a transdermal patch. It has high affinity for both D2 and D3 receptors [8, 9]. Preclinical studies have shown that rotigotine can act as a D2-like receptor agonist [10]. Rotigotine can act as an agonist for all dopamine receptors with a moderate selectivity for D2-like subtypes, particularly D3 receptor [7].

Rotigotine has been reported to have neuroprotective effects against glutamate toxicity [11]. It has also been found that rotigotine has neuroprotective effects against toxicity of 6-OHDA or other neurotoxins [12, 13]. However, it is necessary to investigate whether rotigotine acts through DA D2 or D3 receptor and influences DAergic neurons in vivo and in vitro. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate whether rotigotine could exhibit neuroprotective effect through DA D2 or D3 receptors against 6-OHDA induced toxicity.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Groups of ICR mice (8 weeks old; Samtaco bio Korea, Osan, Korea) were kept in specific pathogen free conditions in an adjusted room with 12/12 h light and dark cycles. Vaginal plugs of female mice housed with a male mouse for 10–12 h were confirmed at 8:00 AM. The day of plug discovery was designated as embryonic day 0 (E0). Embryos were removed after deep inhalation anesthesia by the mother of mouse. Three mice were used for each group regardless of sex (male or female). Animal experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Gyeongsang National University (Approval Number: GNU-151217-M0070).

Primary cell culture and drug treatments

Mouse primary cultures were performed as described previously [14] with minor modifications. Briefly, developmental brains of mice on E12 were resected in Hanks balanced salt solution. Neurosphere cells were isolated from microglial cells, oligodendrocytes, and debris via density gradient. In a 0.1 mg/mL poly-L-lysine-coated well, isolated neurosphere cells were seeded at a density of 100,000 cells per cm2 in a culture medium containing Neurobasal A, B27 supplement, basic fibroblast growth factor, L-glutamic acid, and gentamicin. These cells were subcultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 for 7 days. To investigate the effect of rotigotine on DAergic neurons, 6-OHDA and rotigotine hydrochloride (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) were administrated into the primary culture. Samples for Western blot were prepared at 72 h after treatments.

Stereotaxic surgery and drug treatments

Mice were anesthetized with xylazine (5 mg/kg) and zoletile (10 mg/kg) and located on a stereotaxic frame. To estimate neuroprotective effects of rotigotine, drugs (6-OHDA 0.4 mg/kg; rotigotine 3 μg/kg, 15 μg/kg) were unilaterally injected into the SN of mice midbrains with coordinates of 3.0 mm posterior to bregma, 1.4 mm lateral to the midline, and 4.0 mm ventral to the skull surface based on Mouse Brain in Stereotactic Coordinates [15]. These injections were performed using a Hamilton syringe. The syringe was maintained in place for 5 min after the injection. Skin was sutured and mice were returned to the cage for anesthesia recovery.

Sample preparation and immunohistochemistry

At seven days after injecting rotigotine with 6-OHDA in the SN for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression, mice were deeply anesthetized with xylazine and zoletile and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Brain samples were post-fixed for 48 h and embedded in paraffin wax. Samples were serially sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm with a rotary microtome for immunohistochemistry. Nonspecific reactions were blocked with 3% fetal bovine serum in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at room temperature for 1 h. Slides were incubated with mouse monoclonal primary TH antibody (TH; diluted 1:1,000; Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. Samples were then washed 3 times with PBS and incubated with anti-mouse IgG-Horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 1:1,000, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for anti-TH antibody. After washing, samples were reacted with 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for anti-mouse IgG-HRP. When color was developed, slides were mounted with permount (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA).

Western blot analysis

To estimate expression levels of TH, mouse primary culture was administrated with 6-OHDA (1 μM) and treated with rotigotine and antagonists L-741,626 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) or GR 103691 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) for 72 h. Cultured cells were washed with PBS and total cell lysates samples were prepared using a cell lysis buffer (1 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5 M NaCl, 1% NaN3, 10% SDS, 10% NP-40, and 0.5% C24H39NaO4). An equal amount of sample was loaded onto a 10% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene membranes. Nonspecific reactions were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h. Membranes were then incubated with anti-TH (1:1,000; Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) and anti-actin (1:10,000; Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. After washing 5 times with 0.1% tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST), membranes were incubated with HRP conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Antigen, Seoul, Korea). Densitometry was carried out using Image J.

Statistics

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare multiple groups based on average values and grasp correlations through hypothesis verification. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Intracranial injection of 6-OHDA can induce partial degeneration of DAergic neurons in SN of the mouse midbrain, mimicking the pathology of Parkinson’s disease model in vivo [16]. To investigate the effect of DA D2-like receptor agonist on DAergic neurons, rotigotine was administrated in the SN. Immunohistochemistry was carried out to identify the localization of TH positive cells. In the control group, TH positive cells were observed in VTA and SN (Fig. 1A). Unilateral injection of 6-OHDA (0.4 mg/kg) caused significant loss of TH positive cells in the SN, although TH positive cells were still observed in the VTA (Fig. 1B). DA D2-like receptor agonist rotigotine (3 μg/kg, 15 μg/kg) inhibited the loss of DAergic neurons in the SN of 6-OHDA-induced mouse model of PD at 7 days after administration (Figs. 1C, 1D).

jbtr-21-4-165-g1
Fig. 1. Representative immunohistochemical images of rotigotine in mice midbrains. 6-OHDA and rotigotine were intracranially injected into the substantia nigra (SN) of mouse midbrain unilaterally. Immunohistochemistry was then carried out to identify the localization of TH positive cells. (A) In ventral tegmental area (VTA) and SN, TH positive cells were observed in the control. (B) Unilateral injection of 6-OHDA (0.4 mg/kg) induced significant loss of TH positive cells in the SN compared to the control. (C, D) Rotigotine (3 μg/kg, 15 μg/kg) preserved TH positive cells in the SN against 6-OHDA at 7 days after administration. * Bars: 100 μm. TH, tyrosine hydroxylase.
Download Original Figure

6-OHDA, a selective DAergic neurons neurotoxin, can be used to establish an experimental model of DAergic neuron degeneration [16]. To investigate the effect of 6-OHDA in vitro, 6-OHDA was administrated to mouse primary culture. The control group showed clear TH expression, whereas expression levels of TH were significantly decreased by 6-OHDA at 1 and 10 μM (Figs. 2A, 2B). Therefore, 1 μM 6-OHDA was used at a basal concentration in the following in vitro experiments.

jbtr-21-4-165-g2
Fig. 2. Western blot analysis of TH expression by 6-OHDA. (A) 6-OHDA treatment decreased TH expression in mouse primary culture. (B) Quantification of TH-positive cells after treatment with different doses of 6-OHDA. TH expression was significantly decreased by 6-OHDA (1, 10 μM). Arrows (*) compared to control. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. ANOVA-test was used to calculate p-values. *p < 0.05.
Download Original Figure

To investigate the optimal dose of DA D2-like receptor agonist rotigotine known to exhibit neuroprotective effects, rotigotine and 1 μM 6-OHDA were administrated to a mouse primary culture. Treatment with 6-OHDA (1 μM) resulted in a significant loss of TH expression, whereas treatment with rotigotine (0.01, 0.1 μM) inhibited the loss of TH expression to control level (Figs. 3A, 3B). In the following experiments to investigate whether rotigotine could strongly act through D2 or D3 receptors, rotigotine was used at a basal concentration of 0.01 μM.

jbtr-21-4-165-g3
Fig. 3. Dopamine D2-like receptor agonist rotigotine increases TH expression. Rotigotine and 6-OHDA were co-administrated into a mouse primary culture. (A) Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression was decreased by 1 μM 6-OHDA. (B) Treatment with rotigotine (0.01 μM and 0.1 μM) restored TH expression to control level. Arrows (*) compared to 6-OHDA. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. ANOVA-test was used to calculate p-values. *p < 0.05.
Download Original Figure

DA D2 receptor selective antagonist L’741,626 (0.01, 0.1, 1 μM) was administrated along with 0.01 μM rotigotine and 1 μM 6-OHDA to investigate whether rotigotine would act through D2 or D3 receptors. After treatment with L’741,626 and rotigotine, TH expression was decreased in a dose dependent manner compared to that in the rotigotine group (Figs. 4A, 4B).

jbtr-21-4-165-g4
Fig. 4. Dopamine D2 receptor antagonist L’741,626 decreases TH expression with rotigotine. L’741,626 was co-administrated with 0.01 μM rotigotine and 1 μM 6-OHDA into a mouse primary culture. (A, B) TH expression was significantly decreased by L’741,626 with rotigotine in a dose dependent manner. Arrows (*) compare cotreatment of rotigotine and 6-OHDA. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. ANOVA-test was used to calculate p-values. *p < 0.05.
Download Original Figure

To compare between D2 and D3 receptors, D3 receptor selective antagonist GR 103691 (0.01, 0.1, 1 μM) was administrated with 0.01 μM rotigotine and 1 μM 6-OHDA. Compared to TH expression in the rotigotine group, TH expression in the group treated with GR 103691 (0.01, 0.1, 1 μM) and rotigotine was decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figs. 5A, 5B). When results of groups treated with D2 and D3 receptor antagonists were compared, it was found that rotigotine acted more strongly through D2 receptor than through D3 receptor.

jbtr-21-4-165-g5
Fig. 5. Dopamine D3 receptor antagonist GR 103691 with rotigotine decreases TH expression. GR 103691 was administrated into a mouse primary culture with 0.01 μM rotigotine and 1 μM 6-OHDA. (A, B) TH expression was decreased by GR 103691 with rotigotine. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. ANOVA-test was used to calculate p-values. *p < 0.05.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

DA is synthesized from tyrosine, an essential amino acid. TH can converts tyrosine to DA precursor form L-DOPA. Dopamine depletion is one of the most important features of PD, a common movement disorder [17]. Intracranial 6-OHDA injection is an established method for chronic DA depletion [18]. This compound is absorbed through plasma membrane DA receptors, after which it is rapidly oxidized, resulting in production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and semiquinone that can induce DAergic neurons and selective cell death [19]. Treatment with L-DOPA can dramatically alleviate DA degeneration movement dysfunction. However, its continuous use can induce other movement dysfunctions such as dyskinesia. Using DA agonists is a promising DA degeneration disorder therapy that can reduce dosage of L-DOPA and delay the onset of its side effects [20, 21].

There are two distinct types of DA receptors: D1-like receptor and D2-like receptor, the latter of which includes D2, D3, and D4 receptors. These receptors are classified based on the existence of G protein-coupled structure [22]. Many dopamine receptor agonists can protect DA neurons against 6-OHDA [16, 23, 24]. Although 6-OHDA-induced mouse model is a well-known PD model, effects of DA D2-like receptor agonist in mice with 6-OHDA-induced lesions are not completely understood yet. In this study, we produced mice with 6-OHDA-induced lesions and measured the loss of DAergic neurons following administration of rotigotine, a dopamine D2-like receptor agonist. Rotigotine was developed for the treatment of PD. It has high affinities for D2 and D3 [8, 25]. Many studies have reported that rotigotine has strong affinities for D2 and D3 receptors [7, 10]. In a previous in vitro study, rotigotine has shown neuroprotective effects [11]. However, whether rotigotine might exhibit stronger neuroprotective effect through D2 or D3 receptor remains unclear. Results of the present study revealed that treatment with rotigotine increased the expression of TH in 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity. The present study also showed that the expression of TH through DA D2 receptor was increased more than that through DA D3 receptor. These results suggest that DA D2-like receptor agonist rotigotine exhibits neuroprotective effects on DAergic neurons and that it acts more strongly through DA D2 receptor than through DA D3 receptor.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1D1A1B0704925813) funded by the Ministry of Education.

Ethics Approval

Animal experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Gyeongsang National University (Approval Number: GNU-151217-M0070).

References

1.

Björklund A, Dunnett SB. Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends Neurosci 2007;30:194-202.

2.

Damier P, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, Graybiel AM. The substantia nigra of the human brain. II. patterns of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson’s desease. Brain 1999;122: 1437-1448.

3.

Schultz W. Reward signaling by dopamine neurons. Neuroscientist 2001;7:293-302.

4.

Krabbe S, Duda J, Schiemann J, Poetschke C, Schneider G, Kandel ER, Liss B, Roeper J, Simpson EH. Increased dopamine D2 receptor activity in the striatum alters the firing pattern of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:E1498-E1506.

5.

Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 2011;63:182-217.

6.

Schwartz JC, Diaz J, Bordet R, Griffon N, Perachon S, Pilon C, Ridray S, Sokoloff P. Functional implications of multiple dopamine receptor subtypes: the D1/D3 receptor coexistence. Brain Res Re7 1998;26:236-242.

7.

Scheller D, Ullmer C, Berkels R, Gwarek M, Lübbert H. The in vitro receptor profile of rotigotine: a new agent for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2009;379:73-86.

8.

Cawello W, Braun M, Boekens H. Absorption, disposition, metabolic fate, and elimination of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in man: administration by intravenous infusion or transdermal delivery. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:2055-2060.

9.

Hirano M, Isono C, Sakamoto H, Ueno S, Kusunoki S, Nakamura Y. Rotigotine transdermal patch improves swallowing in dysphagic patients with Parkinson’s disease. Dysphagia 2015;30:452-456.

10.

Wood M, Dubois V, Scheller D, Gillard M. Rotigotine is a potent agonist at dopamine D1 receptors as well as at dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2015;172: 1124-1135.

11.

Oster S, Radad K, Scheller D, Hesse M, Balanzew W, Reichmann H, Gille G. Rotigotine protects against glutamate toxicity in primary dopaminergic cell culture. Eur J Pharmacol 2014;724:31-42.

12.

Bhattamisra SK, Shak AT, Xi LW, Safian NH, Choudhury H, Lim WM, Shahzad N, Alhakamy NA, Anwer MK, Radhakrishnan AK, Md S. Nose to brain delivery of rotigotine loaded chitosan nanoparticles in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Pharm 2020;579:119148.

13.

Yu X, Yao JY, He J, Tian JW. Protection of MPTP-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration by rotigotine-loaded microspheres. Life Sci 2015;124:136-143.

14.

Brewer GJ, Torricelli JR. Isolation and culture of adult neurons and neurospheres. Nat Protoc 2007;2:1490-1498.

15.

Paxions G, Franklin KBJ. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2001.

16.

Kim M, Lee S, Cho J, Kim G, Won C. Dopamine D3 receptor-modulated neuroprotective effects of lisuride. Neuropharmacology 2017;117:14-20.

17.

Perez-Lloret S, Peralta MC, Barrantes FJ. Pharmacotherapies for Parkinson’s disease symptoms related to cholinergic degeneration. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016;17:2405-2415.

18.

Bergamini G, Sigrist H, Ferger B, Singewald N, Seifritz E, Pryce CR. Depletion of nucleus accumbens dopamine leads to impaired reward and aversion processing in mice: relevance to motivation pathologies. Neuropharmacology 2016; 109:306-319.

19.

Choi WS, Yoon SY, Oh TH, Choi EJ, O’Malley KL, Oh YJ. Two distinct mechanisms are involved in 6-hydroxydopamine- and MPP+-induced dopaminergic neuronal cell death: role of caspases, ROS, and JNK. J Neurosci Res 1999;57:86-94.

20.

Schaeffer E, Pilotto A, Berg D. Pharmacological strategies for the management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 2014;28:1155-1184.

21.

Tedroff JM. The neuroregulatory properties of L-DOPA. A review of the evidence and potential role in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurosci 1997;8:195-204.

22.

Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 1998;78:189-225.

23.

Blandini F, Armentero MT. Dopamine receptor agonists for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2014;23: 387-410.

24.

Kim MK, Park HS, Cho JH, Kim GS, Won C. Pramipexole protects dopaminergic neurons through paraplegin against 6-hydroxydopamine. Neuroreport 2015;26:74-80.

25.

Martorana A, Di Lorenzo F, Esposito Z, Lo Giudice T, Bernardi G, Caltagirone C, Koch G. Dopamine D2-agonist rotigotine effects on cortical excitability and central cholinergic transmission in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Neuropharmacology 2013;64:108-113.