Journal of Biomedical and Translational Research
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University
Case Report

Use of imatinib mesylate in a dog with meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology

Joong-Hyun Song1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-6451, Dong-In Jung1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-6006
1Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*Corresponding author: Dong-In Jung Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea Tel: +82-55-772-2361, E-mail: jungdi@gnu.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University. All rights reserved.

Received: Jul 13, 2020; Accepted: Aug 03, 2020

Published Online: Sep 30, 2020

Abstract

A 4-year-old, female, Maltese dog with bilateral hind limb ataxia was brought to Gyeongsang National University Animal Medical Center (GAMC). Based on the previous medical and imaging records, the patient was presumptively diagnosed with a primary brain tumor of the right temporo-occipital lobe on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a local animal hospital. Hydroxyurea and prednisolone therapy was initiated, and the neurological signs transiently improved. Approximately 5 months after the treatment, ataxia recurred and the patient was referred to GAMC. Upon admission, MRI at the same anatomic level as in the previous MRI was performed. Results showed inflammatory brain lesions, not brain neoplastic changes. Considering this finding, the dog was tentatively diagnosed with meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology (MUE). We added oral imatinib mesylate (10 mg/kg every 24 h), and the dosage of prednisolone was increased to 1 mg/kg twice daily. Hydroxyurea was discontinued. A rapid improvement in neurological signs was observed after the initiation of imatinib mesylate treatment. Approximately 2 months after the treatment, the size of the inflammatory lesion remarkably decreased on repeat MRI. The patient had been doing well, and there were no overt neurological signs 259 days after the initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. We describe a case of MUE in a dog that was successfully managed with imatinib mesylate.

Keywords: dog; granulomatous meningoencephalitis (GME); imatinib mesylate; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology (MUE)

Introduction

Granulomatous meningoencephalitis (GME) is a non-suppurative inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease in dogs [1]. Although the etiology is not clearly elucidated, it is immunologically classified as a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease [1, 2]. Because of similar neurological and morphological features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GME is difficult to distinguish from solid brain tumors in clinical practice [1, 35]. GME is categorized as an immune-mediated CNS inflammatory disease referred to as meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology (MUE). Histopathologic examination of affected brain tissues is essential to obtain a definitive diagnosis. However, ante-mortem brain samples are challenging to collect. Thus, a tentative diagnosis of GME is made based on MRI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis findings. After a tentative diagnosis is obtained, combination therapy with conventional immunosuppressive agents plus glucocorticoids is used as a standard therapy similar to other immune-mediated disorders [13, 6].

Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that competitively blocks the ATP binding site of tyrosine kinases (TKs). It has a potent therapeutic effect on cancer by blocking the phosphorylation TKs, which are abnormally activated in malignant process [7]. In human medicine, imatinib mesylate has been used not only to control abnormal tumor growth but also to treat different autoimmune diseases. It is effective for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) in humans similar to non-suppurative immune-mediated inflammatory brain diseases in dogs [7]. Furthermore, one canine study has shown that imatinib mesylate can be a treatment option for MUE in dogs [8].

Herein, we describe a case of MUE in a dog that was successfully managed with imatinib mesylate. Furthermore, to increase our knowledge on the use of imatinib mesylate in dogs with MUE, this study aimed to provide a detailed information on serial changes in clinical and MRI findings.

Case Description

A 4-year-old, female, Maltese dog with bilateral hind limb ataxia was brought to Gyeongsang National University Animal Medical Center (GAMC). The patient initially presented with neurological sign approximately 5 months before presentation to GAMC. Five months back, MRI was performed at a local animal hospital. Results showed a uniformly, ill-defined ovoid mass-like lesion in the temporo-occipital region (Fig. 1). The lesion was hyperintense on T2-weighted (T2W) images and isointense on T1-weighted (T1W) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Moreover, an intense and uniform enhancement was observed on contrast-enhanced T1W (CET1W) images; vasogenic edema that was hyperintense on T2W images was identified around the lesion. The appearance of the lesion was consistent with an intra-axial brain mass, and the patient was presumptively diagnosed with a primary brain tumor at a local animal hospital. Then, treatment with oral hydroxyurea (50 mg/kg every 48 h; Hydrine capsule; Korea United Pharm., Seoul, Korea) and prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg every 12 h; Solondo tablet; Yunhanmedica, Cheongwon, Korea) was initiated. The clinical signs improved gradually. However, ataxia in the hind limbs recurred while tapering the dosage of prednisolone 5 months after the initial treatment. The dosage of prednisolone was again increased to the last effective dose. However, ataxia only slightly resolved. Hence, the patient was referred to our hospital.

jbtr-21-3-137-g1
Fig. 1. Findings of the initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted at a local animal hospital. Transverse plane MRI images at the level of the temporo-occipital lobe: T2-weighted (A), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (B), T1-weighted (T1W) (C), and contrast-enhanced T1W (D) sequences. (A) Vasogenic edema surrounding the lesion was noted (arrows). (B and C) FLAIR and T1W images showed a mass effect; the right lateral ventricle was significantly compressed (empty arrows). (D) A uniformly contrast-enhanced ovoid mass-like lesion was observed (arrowhead). L, left.
Download Original Figure

Upon admission, neurological examination revealed hind limb ataxia, and conscious proprioception was reduced in both hind limbs. No other neurological abnormalities were identified. To re-evaluate the intracranial lesions, we performed brain MRI using a 0.4T scanner (APERTO; Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and CSF analysis (obtained from the atlanto-occipital cistern tap using a 22-gauge needle). An ill-defined lesion with vasogenic edema and mass effect was observed in the right temporo-occipital region (Fig. 2). These findings were significantly different from those on MRI performed 5 months back. The lesion was hypointense on T1W images, iso- to hyperintense on T2W and FLAIR images, and irregularly enhanced on CET1W images. These MRI findings indicated that the lesion was more indicative of an inflammatory brain disease than a primary brain tumor. Conventional CSF analysis revealed an increased nucleated cell count at 5 cells/uL (reference range: <5). Moreover, the protein concentration was 15 mg/dL (reference range: <25). The slightly elevated levels of nucleated cell count in the CSF seemed to be attributed to the prednisolone previous administration. Cytological examination revealed mononuclear cell pleocytosis. Based on the response to prednisolone therapy, irregular inflammatory changes in the lesion on MRI, and CSF analysis results, the patient was diagnosed with MUE. Furthermore, the morphologic features of the lesion on MRI were consistent with focal GME in the brain.

jbtr-21-3-137-g2
Fig. 2. Findings of the second magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted at our institution (5 months after the initial MRI). Transverse plane MRI images at the level of the temporo-occipital lobe: T2-weighted (A), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (B), T1-weighted (T1W) (C), and contrast-enhanced T1W (D) sequences. (A and B) Ill-defined lesion with vasogenic edema and midline shift was noted on the right temporo-occipital lobe (arrows). (C and D) The lesion had an irregular contrast enhancement (arrowhead). L, left.
Download Original Figure

We added oral imatinib mesylate (10 mg/kg every 24 h; Glivec; Novartis, Stein, Switzerland), and the dosage of prednisolone was increased to 1 mg/kg twice daily. Hydroxyurea was discontinued. A rapid improvement in neurological signs was observed after the initiation of imatinib mesylate treatment. To assess for treatment response, MRI was performed again at the same level, as shown in Fig. 2, 71 days after the initiation of imatinib mesylate treatment. The inflammatory lesion with vasogenic edema observed on the previous MRI had almost resolved, and concomitant midline shift had also completely resolved (Fig. 3).

jbtr-21-3-137-g3
Fig. 3. Findings of the third magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted at our institution (71 days after the second MRI). Transverse plane MRI images at the same anatomic level, as shown in Fig. 2, after 71 days of diagnosis and imatinib mesylate treatment: T2-weighted (A), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (B), T1-weighted (T1W) (C), and contrast-enhanced T1W (D) sequences. The inflammatory lesion previously observed had almost completely resolved after treatment with imatinib mesylate (arrows). L, left.
Download Original Figure

The patient continuously received treatment with imatinib mesylate at the same dosage. The dosage of prednisolone was gradually tapered to 0.3 mg/kg once daily. The patient did not experience any relapse of neurological signs. Then, 171 days after the initial presentation, the patient showed mild partial seizure-suspected episodes in the left hind limb. Thus, the dosage of prednisolone was increased to 0.5 mg/kg twice daily, and oral zonisamide (5 mg/kg every 12 h) was added to the treatment regimen. Thereafter, the patient did not present with any neurological signs. However, 259 days after starting imatinib mesylate therapy, the patient suddenly died from acute pancreatitis despite supportive therapy.

Discussion

GME is a canine inflammatory brain disease, which was originally classified as an intracranial tumor due to its morphological features [1, 2]. However, to date, a single granuloma-like lesion, as in the case of focal GME, is extremely difficult to distinguish from some solitary solid brain tumors, such as histiocytosis, primary CNS lymphosarcoma, and meningioma [2, 9]. Histopathologic examination via ante-mortem brain tissue biopsy or postmortem necropsy is essential to obtain a definitive diagnosis of GME. Diagnosis is usually achieved via CSF analysis and MRI examination in clinical practice [1]. In the current case, the initial MRI scan conducted at a local hospital revealed an ovoid mass-like lesion with homogeneous contrast enhancement. Back then, the mass was considered a primary brain tumor. However, the appearance of the lesion on the second MRI conducted at GAMC had changed to an ill-defined inflammatory lesion with irregular contrast enhancement. The MRI features and CSF results were consistent with GME of the prosencephalon in canines. Furthermore, the morphological changes in the lesion on serial MRI after a period of treatment were consistent with inflammatory brain changes. In addition, the patient responded well to dose titration (prednisolone) before the initial presentation and to the combined treatment with prednisolone and imatinib mesylate. Accordingly, the possibility of GME is more strongly considered than that of primary brain tumor. Thus, the patient was tentatively diagnosed with GME [9].

TKs are key mediator enzymes in normal cell signaling that strictly regulate normal cell growth and cell differentiation [7]. They function as an on/off switch in several cellular functions and are abnormally activated in various malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Targeted therapy for dysregulated TKs has been considered a promising strategy for the treatment of some malignancies in human and veterinary practices [10]. Furthermore, the efficacy of inhibiting dysregulated TKs in some immune-mediated diseases has been suggested [11]. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease in humans and is characterized by immune-mediated damage in the normal myelin and axons of the CNS. TKs play a key role in this immune-related process of MS, and clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of blocking TKs in MS treatment [12]. Recently, MS was considered neuropathologically similar to GME, which is considered a T-cell-related autoimmune CNS disorder, in dogs [1, 13, 14].

There are several strategies used for targeting TKs and TKIs, which include the use of a class of drugs that inhibit one or more TKs. Imatinib mesylate is a multi-targeted inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor, c-Kit, c-Abl, c-Fms, Lck, Flt-3, and MAPK [11]. Imatinib mesylate was first introduced as an antineoplastic agent for treating leukemias in humans. However, a few human studies have shown the clinical efficacy of imatinib mesylate in rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and MS as it blocks the activity of imatinib mesylate-targeted TKs [12, 15]. Recently, two veterinary studies have shown the abnormal expression of imatinib mesylate-targeted TKs in canine GME and necrotizing encephalitis (NE) tissues, and one of these studies showed the treatment efficacy of imatinib mesylate in patients with GME [8, 13]. Their results included the overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, c-Kit, and c-Abl in the affected brain tissues.

The current study showed the treatment efficacy of imatinib mesylate in GME. After initiating imatinib mesylate treatment, there was a significant improvement in the lesion in the right temporo-occipital lobe and related perilesional edema and mass effect on the adjacent structures on serial MRI (Figs. 2 and 3). Furthermore, the patient had been doing well after imatinib mesylate treatment. Moreover, there were no evident neurological signs, other than minor partial seizure-suspected activity, during the treatment period. Hence, the relevant effect of imatinib mesylate was confirmed in canine GME.

The focal type of GME has a relatively long-term survival compared with the disseminated form. However, GME generally has a poor prognosis, ranging from weeks to months [6]. The survival time of the patient was 259 days after therapy with imatinib mesylate (410 days after the initiation of prednisolone therapy alone). Although imatinib mesylate treatment was delayed due to the antitumor therapy associated with the misdiagnosis of brain tumor, the patient significantly responded to imatinib mesylate treatment. Furthermore, the patient suddenly died from acute pancreatitis, not from neurological etiologies. Therefore, if early imatinib mesylate treatment was initiated and if acute pancreatitis was properly managed, the patient would have survived significantly longer than 259 days.

Long-term immunomodulating therapy with corticosteroids and adjuvant immunosuppressive drugs in dogs with MUE can cause various adverse effects (gastrointestinal upsets, sporadic infection, etc.) [16, 17]. In terms of adverse effects (e.g., superficial edema, muscle cramps, and nausea), imatinib mesylate is a relatively safe drug for veterinary patients compared with human patients [18]. However, long-term treatment with imatinib mesylate can also affect the normal organs of veterinary patients with active cell cycle and can exert adverse effects, including gastrointestinal problems, hepatotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression [19]. In the current case, we did not find any adverse effects associated with imatinib mesylate during the treatment period. Thus, we surmised that imatinib mesylate might be a very safe and effective treatment modality to canine patient. The patient was severely affected by acute pancreatitis approximately 8 months after the initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. Long-term corticosteroid therapy was previously considered a risk factor for canine pancreatitis. However, the mechanism has not been fully elucidated to date. Furthermore, recent studies have not supported this concept, and they recommend that clinicians should assess for other risk factors associated with pancreatitis in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy [20]. Therefore, the long-term use of prednisolone in this patient might not be correlated with acute pancreatitis, and other factors had affected the development of the condition. Although imatinib mesylate has no adverse effects on the pancreas based on human and veterinary literature, further studies should be conducted to investigate whether imatinib mesylate has any adverse effects on the pancreas.

Herein, we report the use of imatinib mesylate in a dog with GME. The patient’s response indicated that combined therapy with imatinib mesylate plus prednisolone can be well tolerated and can be a good alternative to conventional MUE treatment. The major limitation of this case report is that only one patient was assessed, and there were no available data on immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, including information on the related-TKs of the affected brain tissues of the patient. Therefore, further long-term, controlled, IHC-based studies with a larger population of dogs with MUE must be conducted to establish a new treatment protocol for the use of imatinib mesylate. Furthermore, there are only few data on the potential effects of imatinib mesylate in other autoimmune diseases in the veterinary field. However, the use of this drug for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases might be extremely promising based on the results of the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Talarico LR, Schatzberg SJ. Idiopathic granulomatous and necrotising inflammatory disorders of the canine central nervous system: a review and future perspectives. J Small Anim Pract 2010;51:138-149.

2.

O’Neill EJ, Merrett D, Jones B. Granulomatous meningoencephalomyelitis in dogs: a review. Ir Vet J 2005;58:86.

3.

Mercier M, Barnes Heller HL. Efficacy of glucocorticoid monotherapy for treatment of canine meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology: a prospective study in 16 dogs. Vet Med Sci 2015;1:16-22.

4.

Haouala A, Widmer N, Duchosal MA, Montemurro M, Buclin T, Decosterd LA. Drug interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. Blood 2011;117: e75-e87.

5.

Kipar A, Baumgärtner W, Vogl C, Gaedke K, Wellman M. Immunohistochemical characterization of inflammatory cells in brains of dogs with granulomatous meningoencephalitis. Vet Pathol 1998;35:43-52.

6.

Lowrie M, Smith PM, Garosi L. Meningoencephalitis of unknown origin: investigation of prognostic factors and outcome using a standard treatment protocol. Vet Rec 2013;172:527.

7.

Dinarello CA. Anti-inflammatory agents: present and future. Cell 2010;140:935-950.

8.

Song JH, Hwang TS, Lee HC, Yu DH, Seung BJ, Sur JH, Jung DI. Long-term management of canine disseminated granulomatous meningoencephalitis with imatinib mesylate: a case report. Vet Med 2019;64:92-99.

9.

Cherubini GB, Mantis P, Martinez TA, Lamb CR, Cappello R. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:384-387.

10.

Bavcar S, Argyle DJ. Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: molecularly targeted drugs for veterinary cancer therapy. Vet Comp Oncol 2012;10:163-173.

11.

Azizi G, Mirshafiey A. Imatinib mesylate: an innovation in treatment of autoimmune diseases. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2013;7:259-267.

12.

Azizi G, Haidari MR, Khorramizadeh M, Naddafi F, Sadria R, Javanbakht MH, Sedaghat R, Tofighi ZF, Mirshafiey A. Effects of imatinib mesylate in mouse models of multiple sclerosis and in vitro determinants. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014;13:198-206.

13.

Song JH, Yu DH, Hwang TS, Seung BJ, Sur JH, Kim YJ, Jung DI. Expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α/ß, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, c-Abl, and c-Kit in canine granulomatous meningoencephalitis and necrotizing encephalitis. Vet Med Sci 2020. Forthcoming.

14.

Moon JH, Jung HW, Lee HC, Jeon JH, Kim NH, Sur JH, Ha J, Jung DI. A study of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in dogs as a disease model for canine necrotizing encephalitis. J Vet Sci 2015;16:203-211.

15.

Leder C, Ortler S, Seggewiss R, Einsele H, Wiendl H. Modulation of T-effector function by imatinib at the level of cytokine secretion. Exp Hematol 2007;35:1266-1271.

16.

Song JH, Yu DH, Lee HC, Hwang TS, Kim YJ, An SJ, Jung DI. Evaluation of treatment with a combination of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology: a retrospective study of 86 cases (2009–2017). BMC Vet Res 2020;16:192.

17.

Barnoon I, Shamir MH, Aroch I, Bdolah-Abram T, Srugo I, Konstantin L, Chai O. Retrospective evaluation of combined mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone treatment for meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology in dogs: 25 cases (2005-2011). J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2016;26:116-124.

18.

Bonkobara M. Dysregulation of tyrosine kinases and use of imatinib in small animal practice. Vet J 2015;205:180-188.

19.

London CA. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in veterinary medicine. Top Companion Anim Med 2009;24:106-112.

20.

Mansfield C. Acute pancreatitis in dogs: advances in understanding, diagnostics, and treatment. Top Companion Anim Med 2012;27:123-132.