Journal of Biomedical Translational Research
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University
Original Article

Long term effects after telmisartan administration for cardiovascular-renal axis disorder in cats

Donghyun Han1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-244X, Dong-In Jung2,*http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-6006
1Section of Veterinary Research and Academic Consulting, Veteran, Inc., Seoul 06254, Korea
2Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*Corresponding author: Dong-In Jung Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea Tel: +82-55-772-2361, Fax: +82-55-772-2308, E-mail: jungdi@gnu.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University. All rights reserved.

Received: Nov 13, 2019; Revised: Dec 12, 2019; Accepted: Dec 12, 2019

Abstract

The interaction between the cardiac and renal systems is important in determining blood pressure and blood volume, both of which play a role in the vasomotor system and fluid balance. Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) occurs as a result of a disparity in correlation between the two. In veterinary medicine, cardiovascular-renal axis disorder (CvRD) lacks pathologically and etiologically specific data, but shares common pathophysiological patterns with CRS and CvRD in humans.

CvRD is structural or functional damage caused by diseases of the heart or kidneys, or toxins or drugs, resulting in the disruption of normal interactions between these organs and the destruction of one or both organs. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term changes in various indicators, including hypertension, proteinuria and echocardiographic parameters, before and after administration of telmisartan in cats with CvRD. This study found a clear gradual decrease in Urine protein to creatinine (UP/C) ratio and left atrium (LA) diameter in cats with CvRD, after administration of telmisartan. UP/C ratio (p<0.001) was found to decrease significantly over time, after administration of telmisartan. UP/C ratio before telmisartan administration was 0.39 ± 0.255 (Day 0) and 0.29 ± 0.056 on day 30 (Day 30), 0.28 ± 0.040 on day 60 (Day 60), and 0.20 ± 0.128 on day 90 (Day 90) after administration, respectively. LA diameter before telmisartan administration was 17.9 mm ± 1.6 before telmisartan administration (Day 0) and 17.4 mm ± 1.8 on day 30 (Day 30), 16.1 mm ± 1.6 on day 60 (Day 60), and 15.7 mm ± 1.7 on day 90 (Day 90) after administration, respectively. Oral administration of telmisartan to cats with CvRD is effective in improving proteinuria and LA diameter, which is a positive aspect of long-term survival in cats with CvRD.

Keywords: angiotensin receptor blockers; cardiovascular-renal axis disorder; cat; telmisartan; urine protein to creatinine ratio

Introduction

According to Ronco and colleagues, cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is associated with cardiac and renal disease and is defined by “acute or chronic dysfunction in one organ that may induce acute or chronic dysfunction of the other” [1]. The interaction between the cardiac and renal systems is important in determining blood pressure and blood volume, both of which play a role in the vasomotor system and fluid balance. CRS occurs as a result of disparities in correlations between these.

In human medicine, CRS is classified by five categories: 1) acute cardiorenal, 2) chronic cardiorenal, 3) acute renocardiac, 4) chronic renocardiac, and 5) secondary CRS; this distinction was adopted by veterinary medicine, being termed cardiovascular-renal axis disorder (CvRD) [2]. The correlation of CRS is caused by the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), cardiac output, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and systemic hypertension [3]. In veterinary medicine, CvRD lacks pathologically and etiologically specific data, but shares the common pathophysiological patterns of CRS and CvRD in humans [3]. CvRD has been demonstrated in a number of studies in dogs [4, 5], and similarly been seen in cats [6]. As a result, CvRD is termed as structural or functional damage caused by diseases of the heart or kidneys, or toxins or drugs, resulting in the disruption of normal interaction between these organs and the destruction of one or both organs [3].

Telmisartan is a drug belonging to the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) family, which can respond to the activation of the RAAS by angiotensin escape that occurs with the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), and has proven to be useful for suppressing proteinuria in cats [7]. It is also recommended for systemic hypertension and proteinuria in cats with chronic renal failure [8, 9].

The aim of this study is to compare long term changes of various indicators, including hypertension and proteinuria, before and after administration of telmisartan in cats with CvRD.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The study was conducted in 20 cats (5 spayed females and 15 castrated males, weighing 4.0–7.6 kg) with CvRD with no other disease, aged between 4 and 18 years (mean 10.4 ± 4.6).

Inclusion criteria

Cats participating in this study were selected according to several criteria. For study probabilities, cats with diseases other than CvRD, such as hyperthyroidism or pancreatitis, were excluded. The selection criteria were those who were clinically diagnosed with CvRD, with one of the two following criteria: heart disease with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). For heart disease with HCM, echocardiograms were selected based on the criteria that the size of the left atrium (LA) was more than 15 mm in the right parasternal long axis 4 chamber view [10] and that the thickness of the myocardial muscle was 6 mm or more in the short axis papillary muscle view [11, 12]. Criteria for heart disease with CKD was in accordance with the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages [13], while meeting one or more of the following criteria: cats with CKD at 2–4/4 grades with serum creatinine concentrations above 1.6 mg/dL, Urine protein to creatinine (UP/C) ratio readings>0.2 [14], and hypertensive systolic BP>150 mmHg on Doppler [9, 15]. In addition, the owner had to be present, and individuals weighing less than 2 kg were excluded.

Schedule of events

Before and after telmisartan (Semintra® oral solution, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mexico) administration (1 mg/kg, PO, SID), patients were followed 4 times at 30-day intervals for a total of 90 days. Body weight, serum chemistry (IDEXX Catalyst DxTM Analyzer, IDEXX Laboratories, USA), total cell blood count (CBC; IDEXX Procyte DxTM Hematology Analyzer, IDEXX Laboratories, USA), urine specific gravity (USG), urine pH, and UP/C ratio (IDEXX Catalyst DxTM Analyzer, IDEXX Laboratories, USA) tests were performed at each visit over the course of the follow up period.

Blood pressure

Blood pressure was measured using a Doppler device (Parks Model 811-B, Parks Medical Electronics, USA) according to the consensus guidelines of the International Society of Feline Medicine [9]. Before being examined, cats rested calmly for 5–10 minutes in the examination room. The placement and size of the inflatable cuffs were determined by measuring the forelimbs with the short length of the cuff to be 30%–40% of the forelimb length. The characteristic ultrasonic sound of Doppler devices can cause tension in cats, so headphones were used. After ultrasonic gel was applied to the leg region to be measured and the transducer closely attached, a sphygmomanometer was used to inflate the cuff to a pressure of 20–40 mmHg until no Doppler ultrasound signals generated by red blood cells (RBCs) could be heard. When no sound was heard, the sphygmomanometer was deflated until the sound could be heard again, and at the first moment of Doppler ultrasound detection systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using commercially available statistical software (Jamovi ver 1.0.0 for Mac). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD. Differences in the various indices that change with time before and after administration of telmisartan were assessed using Repeated Measures ANOVA (non-parametric). In all comparisons, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, unless otherwise stated.

Results

The breeds of cats included in this study were as follows: Domestic Short Hair (10/20, 50.0%), Himalayan (1/20, 5.0%), Persian (2/20, 10.0%), Russian Blue (3/20, 15.0%), Siamese (2/20, 10.0%), and Turkish Angora (2/20, 10.0%). The Domestic Short Hair was overrepresented in this study.

As measured by CBC analysis, no significant changes in RBCs or white blood cells (WBCs) were found. Serum chemistry analysis revealed that elevation of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (azotemia), was not statistically significant. In analysis of the liver, there were no significant changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and BUN. No significant changes in hematocrit (HCT) or total protein (TP) related to dehydration were found. As measured by urinalysis, changes in urine pH and USG were not significant. However, although not statistically significant, USG, as well as body weight, was slightly increased (p = 0.912 and p = 0.991, respectively).

UP/C ratio (p<0.001) decreased significantly over time after administration of telmisartan. Before telmisartan administration, the UP/C ratio was 0.39 ± 0.255 (Day 0), and 0.29 ± 0.056 on the 30th day (Day 30), 0.28 ± 0.040 on the 60th day (Day 60), and 0.20 ± 0.128 on the 90th day (Day 90) after administration, respectively. The UP/C ratio was significantly lower in cats with CrVD over time, at each time point from Day 0 to Day 90, at 30 day intervals (Fig. 1A).

jbtr-20-4-99-g1
Fig. 1. (A) UP/C, urine protein to creatinine ratio (UP/C) was measured four times in total, on the first day when no telmisartan was administered (Day 0), and at 30th days (Day 30), 60th days (Day 60), and 90th days (Day 90) after the administration of telmisartan per 30 days interval, was significantly lower at each step over time. (B) LA diameter, Left atrium (LA) diameter was measured four times in total, on the first day when no telmisartan was administered (Day 0), and at 30th days (Day 30), 60th days (Day 60), and 90th days (Day 90) after the administration of telmisartan per 30 days interval, was significantly lower at each step over time.
Download Original Figure

Echocardiographic parameters were decreased in the LA and Interventricular septum end-diastolic diameter (IVSDd), but the left atrial diameter was significantly different (p = 0.011) and the IVSDd (p = 0.381) was not. LA diameter was 17.9 mm ± 1.6 before telmisartan administration (Day 0), and 17.4 mm ± 1.8 on the 30th day (Day 30), 16.1mm ± 1.6 on the 60th day (Day 60), and 15.7 ± 1.7 on the 90th day (Day 90) after the administration, respectively. LA diameter was significantly lower in cats with CvRD over time, at each time point from Day 0 to Day 90, at 30 days intervals (Fig. 1B).

Differences in the various indices that changed over time, before and after drug administration in this study population, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Time difference comparison of various indices in cats with cardiovascular-renal axis disorder (CvRD)
Index Day 0 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90 p-value
BW (kg) 4.7 ± 1.01 4.6 ± 1.21 4.8 ± 1.18 4.8 ± 1.08 0.991
SBP (mmHg) 150 ± 16.9 145 ± 11.8 160 ± 13.0 140 ± 12.6 0.293
Cell blood count
  HCT (%) 46.3 ± 6.77 44.1 ± 6.10 46.1 ± 6.73 44.2 ± 7.97 0.826
  RBC (106μL) 9.5 ± 1.68 9.6 ± 1.70 9.4 ± 1.96 9.0 ± 2.12 0.989
  WBC (103μL) 8.4 ± 4.79 8.0 ± 4.21 7.2 ± 5.68 6.3 ± 6.94 0.892
Serum chemistry
  Albumin (g/dL) 4.0 ± 0.70 4.3 ± 0.62 3.8 ± 0.34 3.9 ± 0.44 0.715
  ALKP (g/dL) 28 ± 9.4 20 ± 12.0 26 ± 8.9 26 ± 9.2 0.303
  ALT (g/dL) 56.5 ± 56.4 64.5 ± 38.4 61 ± 75.2 62 ± 41.4 0.979
  BUN (g/dL) 24 ± 7.8 27 ± 7.6 23 ± 7.5 22 ± 8.4 0.653
  Crea (g/dL) 2.2 ± 0.64 2.0 ± 0.59 1.8 ± 0.64 2.0 ± 0.73 0.875
  TP (g/dL) 7.9 ± 0.66 7.6 ± 0.52 7.8 ± 0.66 7.7 ± 0.45 0.836
Urine
  pH 6.75 ± 0.7 6.5 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 0.4 0.604
  UP/C 0.39 ± 0.255 0.29 ± 0.056 0.28 ± 0.040 0.25 ± 0.128 <0.001
  SG 1.017 ± 0.0098 1.022 ± 0.0110 1.021 ± 0.0175 1.020 ± 0.0143 0.912
Echocardiography
  LA diameter (mm) 17.9 ± 1.6 17.4 ± 1.8 16.1 ± 1.6 15.7 ± 1.7 0.011
  IVSDd (mm) 7.49 ± 0.95 7.36 ± 1.14 7.30 ± 1.11 6.96 ± 0.13 0.381

All data expressed with the mean value (± SD).

SBP, systolic blood pressure; HCT, hematocrit; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell ALKP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Crea, creatinine; TP, total protein; UP/C, urine protein to creatinine ratio; SG, specific gravity; LA, left atrium; IVSDd, interventricular septum end-diastolic diameter.

Download Excel Table

Discussion

This study demonstrated a clear and gradual decrease in the UP/C ratio in cats with CvRD, after administration of telmisartan. Although blood pressure and UP/C ratio were decreased in our previous study of telmisartan administration for CKD in cats [16], this study showed a decrease in UP/C, but no significant change in systemic blood pressure. In addition, although telmisartan is known to have a relatively higher liver clearance than renal clearance [17], no significant changes in serum liver or kidney profiles (albumin, ALKP, ALT, BUN, creatinine) were observed in this study, similar to our previous study [16].

The evaluation of proteinuria for 24 hours and quantitative evaluation would have been inconvenient for the study participants and is also a troublesome procedure. Therefore, we performed the UP/C test, which is a gold standard method for evaluating proteinuria through one-time sampling [18], and results are very similar to the 24-hour quantitative test method [19, 20]. Studies on small animals, including dogs and cats, have shown that proteinuria is closely related to patient survival [14, 2129]. In addition, since proteinuria is closely related to kidney disease [3033], controlling proteinuria in CvRD patients could be a strategy for increasing survival rates [14, 29].

All cats participating in the study were subjected to cystocentesis through an ultrasound guide to collect urine. Therefore, macro hematuria did not occur, but micro hematuria due to blood collection occurred, which caused an occult blood reaction that did not affect the UP/C test [34]. There were no significant differences between urine pH and USG, suggesting that the effect of telmisartan in cats with CvRD was due to vasodilation, rather than chemical changes in the urine. This phenomenon is very similar to a previous study [16] that observed the effect of temisartan in CKD patients.

A decrease in blood pressure, which was significant in a previous study [16], was not found in this study. This suggests the phenomenon is caused by the compensatory mechanisms of cardiac output due to hemodynamic changes caused by HCM, not by the presence of CKD alone, or by the possibility of blood pressure measurement errors that frequently occur in cat patients.

Echocardiography showed that the size of the LA was reduced. Since HCM in cats is a disease characterized by atrial enlargement, these results are very interesting. The reduction in size of the LA due to the administration of ARBs, such as telmisartan, is a positive therapeutic outcome for cats with CvRD. However, IVSDd, which signifies the thickness of the ventricular septum at the time of diastole, decreased over time, but no significance difference was found. There are several limitations to this study. First, there is a low number of research population. A study with a larger research population will be necessary to derive more meaningful results. In addition, the lack of follow-up of other items, besides IVSDd, in echocardiography is the second limitation of our study.

In conclusion, oral administration of telmisartan to cats with CvRD is effective in improving proteinuria, which is a positive aspect of long-term survival in cats with CvRD.

References

1.

Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anavekar N, Bellomo R. Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1527-1539.

2.

Orvalho JS, Cowgill LD. Cardiorenal syndrome: diagnosis and management. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2017;47:1083-1102.

3.

Pouchelon JL, Atkins CE, Bussadori C, Oyama MA, Vaden SL, Bonagura JD, Chetboul V, Cowgill LD, Elliot J, Francey T, Grauer GF, Fuentes VL, Moise NS, Polzin DJ, Van Dongen AM, Van Israel N. Cardiovascular-renal axis disorders in the domestic dog and cat: a veterinary consensus statement. J Small Anim Pract 2015;56:537-552.

4.

Nicolle AP, Chetboul V, Allerheiligen T, Pouchelon JL, Gouni V, Tessier-Vetzel D, Sampedrano CC, Lefebvre HP. Azotemia and glomerular filtration rate in dogs with chronic valvular disease. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:943-949.

5.

Chetboul V, Daste T, Gouni V, Concordet D, Trehiou-Sechi E, Serres F, Pouchelon JL, Germain CA, Layssol-Lamour C, Lefebvre HP. Renal resistive index in 55 dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease. J Vet Intern Med 2012;26:101-108.

6.

Gouni V, Chetboul V, Pouchelon JL, Carlos Sampedrano C, Maurey C, Lefebvre HP. Azotemia in cats with feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: prevalence and relationships with echocardiographic variables. J Vet Cardiol 2008;10: 117-123.

7.

Sent U, Gossl R, Elliott J, Syme HM, Zimmering T. Comparison of efficacy of long-term oral treatment with telmisartan and benazepril in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:1479-1487.

8.

Caney S. Management and treatment of chronic kidney disease in cats. In Practice 2016;38:10-13.

9.

Taylor SS, Sparkes AH, Briscoe K, Carter J, Sala SC, Jepson RE, Reynolds BS, Scansen BA. ISFM consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertension in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2017;19:288-303.

10.

Abbott JA, MacLean HN. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the feline left atrium. J Vet Intern Med 2006;20:111-119.

11.

Fox PR, Liu SK, Maron BJ. Echocardiographic assessment of spontaneously occurring feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An animal model of human disease. Circulation 1995;92: 2645-2651.

12.

Wagner T, Fuentes VL, Payne JR, McDermott N, Brodbelt D. Comparison of auscultatory and echocardiographic findings in healthy adult cats. J Vet Cardiol 2010;12:171-182.

13.

Brown S, Elliott J, Francey T, Polzin D, Vaden S. Consensus recommendations for standard therapy of glomerular disease in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2013;27: S27-S43.

14.

Lees GE, Brown SA, Elliott J, Grauer GE, Vaden SL. Assessment and management of proteinuria in dogs and cats: 2004 ACVIM Forum Consensus Statement (small animal). J Vet Intern Med 2005;19:377-385.

15.

Brown S, Atkins C, Bagley R, Carr A, Cowgill L, Davidson M, Egner B, Elliott J, Henik R, Labato M, Littman M, Polzin D, Ross L, Snyder P, Stepien R. Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:542-558.

16.

Han D, Lee DG, Jung DI. Evaluation of effect over time after oral administration of telmisartan for chronic kidney disease in cats. J Biomed Transl Res 2018;19:86-91.

17.

Sica DA. Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers. Am J Hypertens 2001;14:242S-247S.

18.

Harley L, Langston C. Proteinuria in dogs and cats. Can Vet J 2012;53:631-638.

19.

Adams LG, Polzin DJ, Osborne CA, O'Brien TD. Correlation of urine protein/creatinine ratio and twenty-four-hour urinary protein excretion in normal cats and cats with surgically induced chronic renal failure. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6: 36-40.

20.

Monroe WE, Davenport DJ, Saunders GK. Twenty-four hour urinary protein loss in healthy cats and the urinary protein-creatinine ratio as an estimate. Am J Vet Res 1989;50:1906-1909.

21.

Cook AK, Cowgill LD. Clinical and pathological features of protein-losing glomerular disease in the dog: a review of 137 cases (1985-1992). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996;32: 313-322.

22.

Jacob F, Polzin DJ, Osborne CA, Neaton JD, Kirk CA, Allen TA, Swanson LL. Evaluation of the association between initial proteinuria and morbidity rate or death in dogs with naturally occurring chronic renal failure. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:393-400.

23.

Kuwahara Y, Ohba Y, Kitoh K, Kuwahara N, Kitagawa H. Association of laboratory data and death within one month in cats with chronic renal failure. J Small Anim Pract 2006;47:446-450.

24.

Syme HM, Markwell PJ, Pfeiffer D, Elliott J. Survival of cats with naturally occurring chronic renal failure is related to severity of proteinuria. J Vet Intern Med 2006;20: 528-535.

25.

Jepson RE, Elliott J, Brodbelt D, Syme HM. Effect of control of systolic blood pressure on survival in cats with systemic hypertension. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:402-409.

26.

King JN, Tasker S, Gunn-Moore DA, Strehlau G. Prognostic factors in cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:906-916.

27.

Wehner A, Hartmann K, Hirschberger J. Associations between proteinuria, systemic hypertension and glomerular filtration rate in dogs with renal and non-renal diseases. Vet Rec 2008;162:141-147.

28.

Jepson RE, Brodbelt D, Vallance C, Syme HM, Elliott J. Evaluation of predictors of the development of azotemia in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2009;23:806-813.

29.

Littman MP. Protein-losing nephropathy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2011;41:31-62.

30.

Gansevoort RT, Sluiter WJ, Hemmelder MH, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Antiproteinuric effect of blood-pressure-lowering agents: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10:1963-1974.

31.

Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM, Greene T, Hebert LA, Hunsicker LG, King AJ, Klahr S, Massry SG, Seifter JL. Blood pressure control, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease. The modification of diet in renal disease study. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:754-762.

32.

Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, Locatelli F, Mann JF, Motolese M, Ponticelli C, Ritz E, Zucchelli P. Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. The angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in progressive renal insufficiency study group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:939-945.

33.

Agodoa LY, Appel L, Bakris GL, Beck G, Bourgoignie J, Briggs JP, Charleston J, Cheek D, Cleveland W, Douglas JG, Douglas M, Dowie D, Faulkner M, Gabriel A, Gassman J, Greene T, Hall Y, Hebert L, Hiremath L, Jamerson K, Johnson CJ, Kopple J, Kusek J, Lash J, Lea J, Lewis JB, Lipkowitz M, Massry S, Middleton J, Miller ER, Norris K, O'Connor D, Ojo A, Phillips RA, Pogue V, Rahman M, Randall OS, Rostand S, Schulman G, Smith W, Thornley-Brown D, Tisher CC, Toto RD, Wright JT, Xu S. Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285:2719-2728.

34.

Vaden SL, Pressler BM, Lappin MR, Jensen WA. Effects of urinary tract inflammation and sample blood contamination on urine albumin and total protein concentrations in canine urine samples. Vet Clin Pathol 2004;33:14-19.