Journal of Biomedical Research
Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine
ARTICLE

Primary leiomyoma of the ovaries in a dog

Hyeon-Wook Lee, Kyung-Ku Kang, Chang-Woo Min, Ah-Young Kim, Eun-Mi Lee, Eun-Joo Lee, Myeong-Mi Lee, Sang-Hyeob Kim, Soo-Eun Sung, Kyu-Shik Jeong*
*Corresponding author: Kyu-Shik Jeong, Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea, Tel: +82-53-950-5975, Fax: +82-53-950-5955, E-mail: jeongks@knu.ac.kr

© Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University. All rights reserved. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 24, 2014; Revised: Mar 20, 2014; Accepted: Mar 21, 2014

Abstract

We would like to report a case of leiomyoma of the ovaries in a dog. Leiomyoma is commonly seen in the vagina in dogs. However, it is a very rare neoplasm in the ovaries. As there have only been a few reported cases, this report provides valuable information on veterinary medicine and pathology. Masses found in the ovaries need to be differentiated from other ovarian tumors. Therefore, we describe the gross, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features of a case of ovarian leiomyoma in a 10-year-old female Yorkshire Terrier dog. The mass on the right of the uterus was found accidentally by pelvic ultrasonography. Laparatomy revealed a large multi-nodulated ovarian mass. Grossly, cut surfaces of the mass showed multiple firm whitish nodules in the cortex and bloody loose connective tissue in the medulla. Histopathologically, the cortex of the mass was composed of spindle cells forming interlacing fascicles. The cells had elongated, blunt-ended nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm as detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Immunohistochemical stained sections were immunoreactive for α-smooth muscle actin and desmin but negative for vimentin and S-100. Therefore, differential diagnosis confirmed leiomyoma based on morphology and positive staining for α-smooth muscle actin and desmin.

Keywords: ovary; leiomyoma; interlacing fascicles; α-smooth muscle actin; desmin

Introduction

Leiomyoma arising primarily from the vagina of a bitch is a common tumor, but the mass from the ovary is very rare [1]. To date, few cases have been reported in veterinary medicine [2-4]. To our knowledge, only one case was reported especially in a dog [2]. Since leiomyoma is very low prevalence and asymptomatic, its features and characteristics have seldom been described. Histologically, leiomyoma consists of mostly smooth muscle cells with no mitotic figures [5-9]. It features spindle cells with elongated, blunt-ended nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm that form interlacing fascicles [6-9]. Futhermore, it also needs to be differentiated with other ovarian tumors, thecoma, fibrothecoma and leiomyosarcoma [1, 6]. Differential diagnosis of leiomyoma very similar with fibroma and thecoma has similar morphology with leiomyoma except vacuoles in the cells in hematoxylin and eosin staining [1, 6]. Therefore, Immunohistochemical staining is usually required to diagnose a mass. In immunopathological findings, leiomyoma is positive immunoreactive for α-smooth muscle actin and desmin, negative for vimentin and S-100 [6, 8, 10]. Meanwhile, leiomyosarcoma is positive immunoreactive for vimentin and desmin, less positive for α-smooth muscle actin and S-100 [10]. Fibroma is positive for vimentin and negative for α-smooth muscle actin [11]. For these reasons, we determined the gross, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings to differentiate them.

Case report

The abnormal ovary of a 10-year old female Yorkshire Terrier was presented from a local animal hospital for diagnosis. The history was as follows. The dog had an abdominal mass from a pelvic ultrasonography was found and the mass was on the right side of the uterus. A laparotomy revealed a large multi-nodulated ovarian mass. The mass was found in the right ovary and was clearly separated from the uterus. The left ovary and uterus were normal and an oophorectomy was performed. Tissue was fixed immediately in 10% neutral buffered formalin and submitted for microscopic examination at the Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University. All samples were processed routinely and embedded in paraffin. The tissue was cut into 4 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). For immunopathological studies, the primary antibodies used were α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (Sigma Co, St. Louis, MO, USA), vimentin (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA), S-100 (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA) and desmin (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA). The antigen-antibody complex was visualized by the avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase systems using a commercial kit (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) with 3,3-diaminobenzidine. Immunohistochemical stained sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin.

Grossly, the firm mass measured 12 × 7 × 6 cm with a weight of 173 g. It was multi-nodulated and covered with white thin capsules that were suspected to be tunica albuginea (Fig. 1A). The cut surfaces of the mass showed multiple firm whitish nodules in the cortex (1.5~2.0 cm diameter) and the medulla consisted of thin, bloody, loose connective tissue (Fig. 1B). Microscopy showed that the cortex of the mass consisted mostly of spindle cells with uniform nuclei with blunt ends and eosinophilic cytoplasm. The cells formed interlacing fascicles running various angles so that some bundles were visible in the longitudinal section and others in the cross-section (Fig. 2). These cells lacked criteria of malignancy such as namely cellular pleomorphism, moderate to marked anisokaryosis, moderate to high mitotic figure, invasiveness, hemorrhages or tumor necrosis. In the immunopathological findings, the tumor cells showed strong and diffuse positive staining for α-SMA (Fig. 3A) and desmin (Fig. 3B), whereas, negative staining for vimentin and S-100, except for the endothelial cells for vimentin (Fig. 3C).

jbtr-15-1-53-g1
Fig. 1. Gross findings in ovarian leiomyoma of a dog. (A) A large multi-nodulated ovarian mass measuring 12 cm in diameter is covered with white thin tunica albuginea. (B) Cut surfaces of the mass show multiple firm whitish nodules in the cortex (1.5~2.0 cm diameter) and the medullar consists of thin bloody loose connective tissue.
Download Original Figure
jbtr-15-1-53-g2
Fig. 2. Histopathological findings in the ovarian leiomyoma of a dog. (A) The cells formed interlacing fascicles run at various angles so that some bundles are visible in longitudinal section and others in cross-section. H&E staining. Scale Bar=12.5 μm.
Download Original Figure
jbtr-15-1-53-g3
Fig. 3. Immunohistopathological finding in the ovarian leiomyoma of a dog. (A) Tumor cells show strong and diffuse positive staining for α-SMA. Immunohistochemistry; DAB, hematoxylin counterstain. Scale Bar=50 μm. (B) Tumor cells show strong and diffuse positive staining for desmin. Immunohistochemistry; DAB, hematoxylin counterstain. Scale Bar=50μm. (C) Tumor cells are negative staining for vimentin but endothelial cells of vessels are immunoreactive to it. Immunohistochemistry; DAB, hematoxylin counterstain. Scale Bar=50 μm.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

In dogs, leiomyoma have been commonly detected in the vagina and sometimes gastrointestinal tract and uterine [1, 10, 12]. However, there are few documented cases of leiomyoma in the ovary of a dog [2]. Therefore, this case is valuable information to veterinary medicine and veterinary practitioners likely to encounter cases of ovarian leiomyoma.

In humans, primary ovarian leiomyomas are less uncommon than in dogs and mostly encountered in women aged between 20 and 65 years [5]. Most of that are found incidentally in routine examinations, autopsy, surgery, mass screening, since the tumors are usually asymptomatic, rarely become large [6, 7]. The sizes were usually less than 3 cm in diameter but the largest reported tumor measured 36 × 32 × 25 cm with a weight of 11.65 kg [7]. They are enough to present pelvic pain and increased abdominal girth [7]. However, in our case, ovarian leiomyoma was not large enough to induce pain or increase abdominal girth. Occasionally, the gross features of ovarian leiomyoma reported were just enlarged or cystic structures [6, 13]. The cut surfaces of them showed a whorled pattern or cystic change with a honeycomb appearance [6, 13]. Other changes included hyalinization, fibrosis, calcification, epitheliod change and symplastic change [14]. However, in our case, these features were not presented.

Distinguishing ovarian leiomyoma other ovarian tumor such as fibroma, thecoma and fibrothecoma was required in the present case. Morphologically, fibroma is composed of fibroblasts which are, in general, more slender than leiomyoma cells. The thecoma cells are spindle shaped cells and has elongated nuclei but vacuoles in the cells [1, 13]. The cells of the present mass, however, were spindle shape with elongated, blunt-ended nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. In addition, immunohistochemical stianing is useful in establishing the differential diagnosis. The smooth muscle origin of the tumor was generally detectable, staining with antibodies such as desmin, α-SMA and vimentin [5, 6, 10, 12]. The diffuse, strong positive staining for desmin and α-SMA are characteristic of leiomyoma, and staining for vimentin may help in more accurately defining tumors of questionable malignancy [10, 13]. A further aid in distinguishing smooth muscle cell tumors with peripheral nerve sheath tumor [PNST] is the use of antibodies to the neural antigen S-100 [15]. Our results showed positive staining for desmin and α-SMA, while vimentin and S-100 antigen were not identified, thus supporting a diagnosis of leiomyoma. For more accuracy, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or staining with masson’s trichrome and sudan black also can help diagnose [1, 5].

In this report, we described the gross, histopathological and immunohistochemical features about a case of an ovarian mass in a dog, suggesting that these findings in the ovary were compatible with those of leiomyoma. Rare ovarian leiomyoma needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of other tumors that are apparently composed of spindle-shaped cells. Furthermore, this case also provides valuable information to veterinary medicine and veterinary practitioners what are likely to encounter cases of ovarian leiomyoma in dogs.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Bio-industry Technology Development Program (312062-5) of iPET (Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

REFERENCES

1.

MacLachlan NJ, Kennedy PC. In: Meuten DJ, editor. Tumors of the Genital Systems. Tumors in domestic animals. 2002; 4th edIowaIowa State University Press p. 547-574.

2.

Boeloni JN, Silva JF, Nascimento EF, Serakides R, Ocarino NM. Leiomioma ovariano, tumor de células da granulosa e ovário policístico em cadela: uma rara associação. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinria e Zootecnia. 2013; 65 p. 1577-1580.

3.

Meinecke B. Clinical aspects of ovary tumors in mares. Tierarztl Prax. 1986; 14 p. 501-508.

4.

Cotchin E. Smooth-muscle hyperplasia and neoplasia in the ovaries of domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). J Pathol. 1980; 130 p. 169-171.

5.

Kobayashi Y, Murakami R, Sugizaki K, Yamamoto K, Sasaki S, Tajima N, Tajima H, Onda M, Kumazaki T. Primary leiomyoma of the ovary: a case report. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8 p. 1444-1446.

6.

Wei C, Lilic N, Shorter N, Garrow E. Primary ovarian leiomyoma: a rare cause of ovarian tumor in adolescence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008; 21 p. 33-36.

7.

Khaffaf N, Khaffaf H, Wuketich S. Giant ovarian leiomyoma as a rare cause of acute abdomen and hydronephrosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87 p. 872-873.

8.

Akhtardanesh B, Saberi M, Derakhshanfar A. Gastric leiomyoma in a domestic shorthair cat. Comp Clin Path. 2010; 20 p. 531-534.

9.

Cooper BJ, Valentine BA. In: Meuten DJ, editor. Tumors of Muscle. Tumors in domestic animals. 2002; 4th edIowaIowa State University Press p. 319-364.

10.

LaRock RG, Ginn PE. Immunohistochemical staining characteristics of canine gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Vet Pathol. 1997; 34 p. 303-311.

11.

Stacy RC, Jakobiec FA, Fay A. Collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma) of the orbital rim. Oph-thal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 29 p. e101-e104.

12.

Frost D, Lasota J, Miettinen M. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Leiomyomas in the Dog: A Histopath-ologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of 50 Cases. Vet Pathol. 2003; 40 p. 42-54.

13.

Thamboo TP, Lee YS. Pseudocystic leiomyoma of the ovary: a case report and literature review. Pathology. 2003; 35 p. 534-535.

14.

Matamala MF, Nogales FF, Aneiros J, Herraiz MA, Caracuel MD. Leiomyomas of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1988; 7 p. 190-196.

15.

Billson FM, Mould JR, Lee WR. Myxoid leiomyoma of the iris in a dog. Vet Ophthalmol. 2003; 6 p. 173-176.